Friday, October 30, 2026

NS/NKP Bridge over Huron River north of Milan, OH

(no Bridge Hunter; Satellite)

Big Boy 2026:

MP Rail Photography posted
With jet skiers looking on, NS 061, with the UP Big Boy leading, crosses the Huron River as it heads into Bellevue on the NS Cleveland District.
July 13, 2026
Milan, Ohio
Power
UP 4014 - 4-8-8-4 Steam Locomtive (Big Boy)
UP 1616 - SD70M (The Lincoln)
NS 2026 - SD70ACe (The Lady Liberty)
NS 250 - SD70ACe (The Freedom)
NS 1776 - SD70ACe (The Bell)
UP 1776 - SD70M (America250 Unit)

Comments on the above post

The north/south route is the abandoned Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad. At first I was surprised that the routes were not connected since NKP owned both routes since the 1920s. Then I saw the connection a little east of Wikel Road.
1959/60 Milan Quad @ 24,000

That connection still exists because NS still uses the W&LE route to the Huron Docks.
rail.guide

Coalfields Expressway


Mark Lowe posted (source)
🏗️ Massive Bridge Beams Ready for Lift | Coalfield Expressway – Grundy, VA
Follow for more aerial construction updates and unique drone views from Southwest Virginia!

"Designated as part of the National Highway System, the new road will link Interstates 64 and 77 in West Virginia with Route 23 in Virginia, which links to interstates in Kentucky and Tennessee. Sections of the route also overlap federally-designated Corridor Q: Route 460, which is currently being constructed/developed." [vdot]

vdot_map

wvva (pdf)
The Coalfield Expressway (US Route 121) posted
I wanted to bring this article from December 2025 back around because there is a lot of information in it that I don’t think received enough attention.
The study found that completing the Coalfields Expressway could reduce some travel times by as much as 40%, while improving freight access, emergency response, access to healthcare, workforce opportunities, tourism and economic development.
But while reading through the information behind this study, I kept coming back to a question:
What about the rest of the Coalfields Expressway?
A lot of the progress we have seen in Virginia has been around Buchanan County and the sections that overlap or connect with US 460/Corridor Q.
There is a reason for that.
Corridor Q is part of the Appalachian Development Highway System and has access to dedicated federal funding that the broader Coalfields Expressway currently does not. VDOT’s own 2025 funding study acknowledges that the shared CFX/Corridor Q sections have advanced more rapidly because of that funding advantage, while much of the remaining CFX is still unfunded.
That explains what has happened.
But I don’t think it means we should lose sight of the original vision.
The Virginia Coalfields Expressway was designed as approximately 50 miles of limited-access highway beginning at US 23 near Pound, traveling through Wise, Dickenson and Buchanan counties, and continuing to the West Virginia state line.
The Pound Connector, Cranes Nest and Doe Branch portions through Wise and Dickenson counties are still part of that plan.
And those sections matter.
Dickenson County does not have the kind of modern four-lane highway access enjoyed by much of Virginia. Improving transportation access through Wise and Dickenson counties wouldn’t simply make it easier to drive somewhere. It could change what is possible for those communities.
When businesses consider where to locate, transportation matters.
When families consider where to live, access matters.
When industries need to move freight, access matters.
When someone needs specialized healthcare, access matters.
And when we talk about reversing population loss and creating opportunities for our children to stay in Southwest Virginia, infrastructure matters.
There is actually some encouraging information in the 2025 funding study.
The study specifically recommends prioritizing high-impact sections of the CFX, including the Pound Connector Alpha Section, and identifies 24 potential funding opportunities that could be explored.
It also recommends pursuing designation of the Coalfields Expressway as part of the Appalachian Development Highway System, which could potentially open the door to funding sources that have helped Corridor Q advance.
That raises an important question worth asking:
If ADHS funding helped move Corridor Q forward, how hard are we pushing to obtain similar eligibility for the rest of the Coalfields Expressway?
Because the goal shouldn’t simply be connecting Virginia to the new US 460 highway Kentucky built.
Kentucky’s investment is valuable. The US 460 improvements between Pikeville and Virginia give our region another connection to US 23 and create opportunities that did not exist before.
But that connection should complement the Coalfields Expressway, not replace the original vision.
And we can’t forget West Virginia either.
This was never supposed to be only a Virginia road.
The completed Coalfields Expressway is intended to create a continuous regional corridor connecting US 23 near Pound through the Virginia coalfields, across southern West Virginia and ultimately to I-64/I-77 near Beckley.
West Virginia has been making slow but real progress too. About 14 miles from Sophia to Mullens are already open. Construction has been underway on another section near Welch, and another section toward Pineville/Twin Falls has moved forward.
There is still a tremendous amount of highway left to build in both states.
That’s exactly why I think we need to keep talking about it.
One of the most common comments I see is:
“We’ll never see the Coalfields Expressway completed in our lifetime.”
Maybe we won’t.
But roads this large aren’t built all at once. They are built a few miles at a time, through different funding programs, different administrations and sometimes over decades.
The question shouldn’t be whether it can all be built tomorrow.
The question should be:
What is the next section, what funding does it need, and what are we doing right now to get it?
The 2025 study identified 24 possible funding opportunities. It recommends pursuing new federal eligibility, combining multiple funding sources, strengthening regional partnerships and continuing advocacy.
Those are things we should be talking about.
I created this page because I want more people in Virginia and West Virginia to understand what the Coalfields Expressway could mean for our communities and to keep attention on the entire project.
I am independent of the Coalfields Expressway Authority, VDOT, WVDOH or any government agency. I’m simply trying to bring more awareness and support to a project that has the potential to open parts of Appalachia that have been geographically and economically isolated for generations.
I appreciate every mile that gets built.
I just don’t want us to forget about all the miles in between.
Pound. Wise County. Dickenson County. Buchanan County. McDowell County. Wyoming County. Raleigh County.
The vision was to connect the Coalfields.
Let’s keep advocating for the whole vision.

Thursday, October 29, 2026

2016 King's Mill Covered Bridge over Olentangy River near Southeast of Marion, OH

(Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; Satellite)

Street View, Aug 2021

There are quite a few covered bridges in the USA, so I now generally skip them. But the dormers in the roof of this bridge caught my eye.
Marijane Brown posted two photos with the comment: "Kings Mill Covered Bridge, Marion, Ohio."
1

2

Bruce Johnson, Mar 2024

In the 19th Century, truss bridges replaced covered bridges. In 2016, a covered bridge replaced a truss bridge.
The covered bridge cost $3.2m. [MarionStar]
Rusty Bales posted nine photos with the comment:
Fascinating engineering on The Kingsmill covered bridge in Marion, Ohio. They actually built the bridge on the road then slid it into place. I'm not sure why they did it that way. When they placed it in place, the bridge actually settled between 9-12". I have included pictures from various friends. I will also provide some links with more pics, videos, and fun facts. As soon as the blacktop factories open they will lay the road and it'll be open mid May. Right next to a beautiful golf course. 
Scott, The picture you posted, I believe, is the latest.— at Kings Mill Covered Bridge.
[The comments contain links to three YouTube videos.]
1
The old metal bridge.
Scott Wagner: Did they re-purpose this bridge or was it scrapped?
Rusty Bales: It's sitting on the golf course all stacked up waiting for a buyer. Most interested parties are golf courses out west probably to be reassembled on the course. [I wonder if it is wide enough for a two lanes of golf carts. This photo is now (2026) ten years old. I also wonder what happened.]

2
Building it on dry ground south of the river.

3
Slowly coming together soon to be slid into place.

4
40% over the water.

5
Engineers and builders surveying the move.

6
Now in place.

7
Once the support beams are knocked out it will settle 9-12"

8
The worlds largest game on Jenga begins.

9
A view from Kingsmill golf course hole #3, a Par 3 176 yards. This will be a photographers favorite spot to snap photos.

Rusty Bales commented on Photo 1
Another reason to build a bigger taller more beautiful bridge. 😉

This is the truss bridge that was replaced.
MarionStar_gallery
"The Parker through truss bridge spanning the Whetstone River on St. James Road is closed through Dec. 3, and will be replaced by wider and stronger wooden covered bridge. The original bridge once spanned the Scioto River on Ohio 4 before it was moved to its current setting in 1937 just north of the Kings Mill Golf Club, which opened in 1966. James Miller/The Marion Star"

"Wright said his office originally estimated the covered bridge’s cost at just more than $2 million in 2006 when they decided the bridge had to be replaced, and that cost was commensurate with the cost of a more traditional steel arch girder design also considered. A concrete and girder bridge would have to be built higher to achieve the same water clearance over the river, meaning a portion of both St. James and Whetstone River Road would have to be raised 2 to 3 feet, which added the potential need for land acquisition." [MarionStar]

When I read the above about a clearance issue for a girder bridge, I wondered what the issue was. It looked like there was plenty of room for canoes to pass underneath. Then Rusty's photo above of a flood answered the question; they needed enough clearance to pass flood water.

1930 Cascade River Road Bridge over Skagit River at Marblemount, WA

(Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; Historic Bridges; Satellite)

It looks like it is just one lane. 
Street View, Sep 2024

Indeed, it is just one lane.
Street View, Sep 2024

WSDOT via BridgeHunter
"Continuous Warren through truss"

I had noticed the top-chord members over the piers. BridgeHunter explains that this is a continuous truss.
Lorena Miller, Nov 2020

Shelly Johnson posted three photos with the comment:
Marblemount Bridge over the Skagit River. 
I've always had a thing for old bridges.
1

2

3


Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Langdon Bridge over Yellow Creek at Hopewell, PA

(Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; HAER; Satellite)

HAER PA,5-HOPEV,1--1
GENERAL VIEW OF BRIDGE, LOOKING EAST - Bedford County Bridge No. 4, Township Route 655 spanning Yellow Creek, Hopewell, Bedford County, PA

"Significance: This steel-constructed Pratt through truss is a typical metal truss span of the late nineteenth century. It is, however, one of the region's few surviving Keystone Bridge Company spans built for wagon traffic." [HAER_data]

PRR Bedford Branch History Preservationist posted two photos with the comment:
Yellow Creek Bridge in Hopewell. 
Built in 1889 this is a Steel Pratt through-truss bridge. Built for wagon and car traffic to Hopewell Pa. Where it was a rail hub due to the H&BTM’s presence. 
This bridge was built by the King Bridge company. And is one of the last remaining examples of their work.
The Pratt through-truss bridge was invented by Thomas and Caleb Pratt in 1844, the design features diagonal elements that handle tension and vertical elements that handle compression.
This was the go to method of building bridges when we finally started to transition from wood frame to Wrought iron framed to steel framed. 
Most of these bridges are gone today because they were built to hold horse and carriages and couldn’t handle the weight of modern vehicles.
So we are lucky to have some a fine and preserved example of this building method in our great county.
Art Suckewer: ....While they aren't designed for modern loads, they were designed to hold a load of cattle or a steam tractor - correctly restored, they can be rated for 15 - 20 tons. The real problem is 'the system' is no longer capable of maintaining, inspecting (I don't mean spotting 'stuff'; I mean understanding it's significance) or correctly restoring these old bridges. The true wrought iron is no longer made, few know how to properly hot rivet, fewer still know how to properly work the old metal or join it to modern equivalents. The engineers aren't trained in restoration and have restrictive rules imposed on them. On top of this, the system is set up for low bid, not quality. Thus, it's no surprise that the governmental entities that own these old truss bridges consider them money sucking white elephants! If done right, these old truss bridges are practical and affordable to restore and maintain. There are a bunch of people trying to change the way things are done but it's going to be a challenge.
1

2

H&BTM = Huntingdon & Broad Top Mountain, which went from the Pennsy mainline in Huntingdon to the Pennsy Everett Branch.
PRR Bedford Branch History Preservationist posted via Dennis DeBruler


IORY/DT&I Quincy Trestle over Great Miami River near Quincy, OH

(Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; Satellite)

MP Rail Photography posted
CRC 1776, the Spirit of Lebanon, brings up the rear of the Ohio Rail Experience's Lima Limited.  Seen here crossing the Quincy Trestle as it heads north on the DT&I toward Lima.
October 3, 2026
Quincy, Ohio
Power:
CRC 1776 - GP30

2016 photo by Paul Plassman via BridgeHunter

Photo by railphotoart from Flickr via BridgeHunter

Jones Media (Brian Jones), Dec 2018

Hennepin Canal Lock #4 and Aqueduct #1

Lock: (Satellite)
Aqueduct: (Satellite)


Andy Zukowski posted
Birdseye view of Chicago, Ottawa & Peoria Trolley Tracks West Of  Bureau,  Illinois. C1910
John Schlegle: A historic Bureau Co. photo showing 3 modes of transportation crossing over East Bureau Creek. The Hennepin Canal (Lock #4, Aqueduct #1), Rock Island RR and C, O, & P Interurban ran parallel from Bureau Junction to this point (SW of Princeton) where the interurban (right) began heading towards Princeton. Present day Hornbecker's Garden sits on the bluff directly above Lock #4. The remains of the Aqueduct & Interurban Bridge can still be found today.
Dennis DeBruler: John Schlegle Thanks for identifying the lock and aqueduct.