Showing posts with label energyWind. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energyWind. Show all posts

Saturday, May 6, 2023

Historic Chicago River Mouth and Harbor

(Satellite)

These notes cover the time period when sails and steam powered the ships and tugs. For later views of the Chicago River mouth, see S-curve and Chicago River Controlling Works.
The Illinois Central Grain Elevator notes also have some images of old ships.

Some sources consider the entire river to be a harbor.
 
Paul Petraitis updated

chiriverlab_timeline
Between 1816 and 1834 the sandbar at the mouth was channelized.
 
1 of 2 images posted by BDBRCPC
Chicago In 1779 (then called Eschikago) showing the cabin of Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, the first permanent settler of the city, color lithograph produced by Ackerman & Sons, 1930.
A portrait of Du Sable is on the lower right, while his cabin is more closely rendered in the lower left of the image. (Photo by Chicago History Museum/Getty Images).
[The comments provide more information about Jean Baptiste Point du Sable.]
Vanished Chicagoland shared

BDBRCPC posted three images with the comment: "The Town of Chicago, population 350. Incorporated August 5, 1833. https://collections.leventhalmap.org/search/commonwealth:0r96fm830"
Raymond Kunst shared
Jonathan Billig: The original city limits were 22nd Street to the south, North Ave.(1600 n.) to the north, Wood Street (1800 w.) to the west, and, of course, the lake to the east.
1

2
Crowley's Yacht Yard Lakeside posted
Map of Chicago looking west in 1833 when the population had reached a teeming 350.
The early Chicago River is shown with some ancient tributaries. 
For perspective, Sam Miller's Public House was located on what would later be called Wolf Point.

3

Brendon Baillod posted three images with the comment:
This amazing vintage gatefold woodcut engraving arrived this week.  It is an original two page fold-out illustration from Harper's Weekly dated June 1884 and is nearly 140 years old.
It shows a birds-eye view of an extremely busy Chicago harbor mouth and is lavishly detailed.  It gives an excellent feel for the hustle and bustle of a large early Great Lakes port, capturing the smoke, soot and general congestion of the river mouth.
There is a lot to unpack in this image, with many interesting vessels, including the sidewheeler Chicago, a fully rigged barkentine and several other interesting vessels.  The Life Saving Station is visible at the pierhead and a great deal of Chicago's early waterfront is rendered with excellent detail.
This image was too big to scan so I photographed the page, which reduced the resolution and introduced some coloration.  It was made from the top of the lighthouse at the harbor entrance and was likely adapted from an original photograph, which no longer exits.
Brendon Baillod shared
Dennis DeBruler shared

Chicago River Mouth in June 1884

When I glanced at this image, I knew it was old because:
  • black smoke was still condered a sign of prosperity
  • the Illinois Central still had both of its grain elevators
  • the Interstate Exposition Building (the one with three domes) is still standing
  • some of the ships have sails
  • the lumber trade is at the mouth rather than down by Lumber Street on the South Branch
  • there is no fill east of the IC trestle along the lakefront
  • there is a railroad bridge connecting IC and C&NW's Navy Pier line
1

2

3

Dennis DeBruler commented on his share

Brendon Baillod posted
This excellent early Chicago stereoview arrived today.  It shows a scene on the Chicago River looking east out the harbor mouth at Lake Michigan.
The card was made about 1882 and is a republication made by the Chicago stereoview publisher George F. Gates.  The original image is a bit earlier, dating from about 1880.  
[The description continues with an analysis of the schooner Mary E. Perew.
From Brendon's private collection. It is used with permission.]

Brendon Baillod posted
This imperial size stereoview card of Chicago Harbor arrived today. It was published in 1885 by Woodward Stereoscopic Company of Rochester, New York as part of their Chicago, Ill and Vicinity series.
It is titled Chicago Harbor from Lake Street Bridge and shows a harbor tug working on a large schooner with a grain elevator in the background. When I bought the view, I was pretty sure I saw a nameboard on the schooner, but unfortunately, it was just one of the scuppers. Additionally, much of the view is obscured by the tug's steam, and the exposure is also somewhat uneven.
The tug is a bit more interesting. She bears an ornate V.O.T.C on her bow, signifying the Vessel Owners Towing Company of Chicago. They owned about a dozen tugs, but only a few at Chicago during this period. Based on the date of the view, which is known with some accuracy, she might be the tug Thomas Hood, but I'd welcome other opinions.
[From Brendon's private collection. It is used with permission.]

Brendon Baillod posted
It's been a good week for new acquisitions.  This stereoview of the Chicago River arrived today.  I believe it shows the Clark Street Bridge in the distance as a tug brings a three-masted schooner up the river on the right and a large passenger steamer approaches on the left.
The card was extremely dirty when I received it with the vessels being mostly obscured.  I cleaned it gently with a damp cloth and distilled water, which removed a surprising amount of dirt and grime.  The cloth was black when I was done.
This is a view I've never seen before and appears to be a 1880s or 1890s reproduction of an earlier original as evidenced by the single panel that comprises both the left and right images.  The actual image looks to be from the 1870s.  No names are visible on the vessels but the flag on the stern of the steamer is nearly legible.
[[Image copyright © 2023 by Brendon Baillod.From Brendon's private collection. It is used with permission.]
Brendon Baillod shared
Terry Gregory: Very interesting. My GGGF was a well known Chicago Shipbuilder from 1855-1884. I’ve been researching his boats for 20 years. Here is my research (also a Chicago Historian).
https://chicagology.com/harbor/ships/
Brendon Baillod: Terry Gregory That's an excellent piece of research! Thanks for sharing. I come across John Gregory regularly in my research and have researched or own images of many of the vessels he owned. I see them regularly in vessel enrollments, news micros, USLSS Annual Reports, MVUS registers and Inland Lloyds/BLU registers.

Association for Great Lakes Maritime History posted
A repaired image from a damaged dry plate negative of the Chicago River looking east from the Rush Street Bridge, circa 1905 (Image Source: Library of Congress – Detroit Publishing Co. Collection). A high-resolution copy of the photograph shows the steamer Virginia on the right.
In the background on the right is the steamer Iowa. On the left side of the image is the schooner W. O. Goodman of Chicago. The freighter Syracuse of the “New York Central & Hudson River R.R. Line” is in the background on the left side of the river. 
In the foreground on the left is the tug Harry C. Lydon towing a barge. The wording “Chicago & Great Lakes D.&D. Co.” appears on the vessel’s bow. In the background on the right is the tug A.B. Ward which appears to have towed a barge of coal to alongside the Virginia for fueling.
[The description goes on to provide the history of the ships.]

Brendon Baillod posted
Here's a rare, early Great Lakes nautical woodcut I picked up last week.  This view of Chicago harbor dates from 1885 and was published in Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper of January 16, 1886.
It shows an extremely busy Chicago harbor with a great deal of intermodal transportation.  The railyards near the waterfront were immense even in 1886, while the harbor traffic includes schooners, tugs, a sidewheel steamer (probably the Sheboygan or Muskegon) and a large number of steam dredges actively engaged in deepening the basin south of the harbor pier.
This woodcut is relatively uncommon and this is the first time I've seen it on the market.  This is a photographic view as it was too large for my scanner bed.  Thus, the uneven lighting.
[This is a digital image of an archival original in my private collection.  Please include original description if resharing on Facebook.  Please credit the Brendon Baillod Collection if you wish to share outside of Facebook.]
Brendon Baillod shared

Monday, July 13, 2020

A Collision in the Welland Canal

I started adding this info to my Welland Canal notes, but it became large enough that I moved it to its own notes.

Niagara_411 posted four photos with the comment:
Two ships collided earlier today in the Welland canal just north of the Welland docks.
No injuries reported.
Both vessels appear to have sustained serious damage.
The post I had originally shared seems to have been removed by the original poster so it disappeared from my page as well.
UPDATE- Red freighter allegedly lost steering. Both pilots were communicating.
Location - Port Robinson. Wharf 10 between lock 7 & 8. [Some comments dispute this location.  Joel Grahm provided the most specific information, "behind Eastdale school," other than the "behind my house" type of comments.]
[I had to sort through a lot of noise comments like "were they texting?" to find some useful information.]
Linda Passfield-Thomas Apparently both boats were communicating with each other and because one ship lost its steering they decided to do this rather than have a bigger problem later. One helping the other out!! Saved probably a lot of money.
[I believe this means that the black ship used its functional steering to do a hard port turn to transform the collision into a glancing blow rather than a head-on collision. Another comment indicates the black ship did this to stop the broken red ship so that it did not allide with a bridge or something along the side of the canal. But it looks like the red ship could stop with full astern. Or was that the black ship pushing it backwards?]
Tom Drozd Jim Simpson apparently full astern wasn’t employed.
Shannon Lewis-Vary Tom Drozd it not like that can happen instantly.
[I noticed after a delay that the red ship did go backwards.]
Lon F Caselton Ships are impossible to stop on a dime..slow motion crashes are not unusual..
Tanya Cullen Lon F Caselton so true . Depending on size of ship , cargo and speed , it can take 20 minutes to stop if ship going only 15 knots.
Rhonda Sernick In a way good thing for communication and probably planned on this to stop the boat to help.
Dalton Miller Mary Veres a simple mechanical failure such as a hydraulic failure is all you need for this to happen. No hydraulics = no rudder. [I would think they would have redundant hydraulic controls like airplanes do.]
1

2

3

4

Jax Sixstring commented on 411's post
Happened directly behind our house in Welland, not Port Robinson. One of the vessels was listing.
[Judging from the stripes, this was the black one.]
Kevin Harris Lisa Chandler Being The Red Ship Has a Bulbous front End and the Black Ship doesn't, It has most definitely tore and buckled plates and water is coming in On the black ship Known As Listing or Sinking.

Zachary Kindy commented on 411's post
[This has audio so that you can hear the "crunch."]
[There are lots of posts of this video.  E.g. post. Hopefully the lawyers won't bother trying to erase reality and these will remain viewable.]

Dave Hennigar commented on 411's post

Jennifer Best commented on 411's post

(new window) We can start the timer as to how long it will take the lawyers to get rid of this video.
Stop watching after the crash to avoid hearing the F-word. At least he waited until after the sound of the crunch before saying it. Alex Stewart's original post. And his Facebook video.


Screenshot @ -0:14, cropped

411's post of the video without audio.
Paulina Batorek There’s so many idiot people that don’t read the article that goes with the photo or video...

Guys. The ship lost steering. They communicated with the other ship. A few scratches or a torn metal side plate of the boat costs less that replacing a brid
ge or port or anything else.

Yes they saw each other. There is no conspiracy 😂
My friend works on the boat that helped the other boat stop. This was planned to help.

🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️ read the articles.

William Wasiloff III shared Alex's post.
Doug Covey One [black] is McKeil’s Florence Spirit, a regular canal user. The other [red], a salty, had a pilot on board.

Carla Hamlyn commented on 411's video, cropped
Docked near lock 7

Comments on 411's video
[I quit looking after 52 of the 171 comments.]

safe_image for Officials investigating after 'rare' collision between ships in Welland Canal
[The red boat was upbound to Duluth and these comments say the black ship lost steering.]


Bill Moran posted four photos with the comment:
FLORENCE SPIRIT upbound at Sarnia on Monday morning, headed to Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin for repairs after her collision with ALANIS in the Welland Canal just over two weeks ago.
She may have made it through the rivers in darkness, but was held up a little with other ship traffic, and they were managing issues with the current.
ALANIS is being repaired by Heddle Marine at Port Weller and will delivery her cargo to Duluth after she is fixed. (Bill Moran photos)
Andrew Haenish shared 
1
FLORENCE SPIRIT at Sarnia on July 27 2020. She's sporting damaged from her collision in the Welland Canal on July 11 mid-afternoon (Bill Moran photo)

2
(Bill Moran photo)

3
The damage to the starboard side was mostly caused by the bulbous bow on the ALANIS. There is a lot of frame work to be repaired. The Sturgeon Bay shipyard will figure it out (Bill Moran photo)

4
The ship was built in Japan in 2004 as ARKLOW WILLOW, under Irish registry. She was sold Canadian and renamed FLORENCE SPIRIT in 2016. (Bill Moran photo)

14 photos of the ships after the collision
Janey Anderson: Impressive shots indeed - hard to comprehend how mangled she was and repaired fairly quickly if I remember correctly. Occurred 2020-07-12 and Marine Transport has STILL not issued a report and no date posted.

 

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Huge Ship Crane Collapses During Testing

As wind turbines get bigger, the cranes that build them, and the cranes that build the cranes, have to get bigger.
Screenshot via AmericanCranesAndTransport
Liebherr built a new port side crane, TCC 78000, to help install a new 6,603 ton (5,000 tonne) crane on the offshore heavy lift wind installation vessel Orion. The capacity of the port crane is 1,600 tonnes. [YouTube-comment]
AmericanCranesAndTransport
The new crane on the ship, Heavy Lift Crane (HLC) 295000, is the largest Liebherr has ever built. It collapsed while being tested with less than half of its design load because the crane hook broke. Why the hook broke is still under investigation, but Liebherr is quick to point out that the hook was designed and built by an external supplier. The Orion is scheduled to install the Moray East wind farm 14 miles (22 km) off the coast of Scotland. The farm should produce 1,116 MW with turbines that have a tip height of 669' (204 meters). [AmericanCranesAndTransport]

(new window)  There were a few minor injuries.


Update:
(new window) Actually, the only new information I got from this video was that the boom flipped backwards after the hook lost the load. I surmise that booms are designed to withstand loads bending them down, but not for loads bending them up.



Wednesday, November 6, 2019

"Boom Buggy" for moving a crane from one wind turbine to another

Building wind turbine farms need big cranes. And moving them from one wind turbine to another in a farmer's field is a significant source of crane accidents. And if there are high tension wires crossing the field, the move becomes even more difficult. (Since the purpose of a wind turbine farm is to generate electricity, there does need to be a high tension line in the area to deliver the turbines' power to an urban area.) Purpose built vehicles to help hold the boom further from the tip are being developed. I wonder if they are going to start being used for regular moves and not just "line pushes" as an alternative to laying mats across the field.

Charles Edler posted
A little powerline crossing or as we in the business call it line push check out the boom buggy ...hope everyone is having a wonderful and blessed day!
Bill Finerty Did you leave full rocks on the machine
Charles Edler Bill Finerty yes
Charles Edler Bill Finerty sometimes we have to take of some rocks depending on the height of the powerline
Claudio Cerna How much stick?
Charles Edler Claudio Cerna 321.5' main and the Harley tip 25'
Brian Lynch Charles Edler what’s a Harley tip?
Charles Edler Brian Lynch upper boom point ....wind tip not to be confused with wind jib it's a Manitowoc description of the tip section
Ryan Abbott Who built the buggy? Would be cool to see more info on it.
Charles Edler Ryan Abbott one of our haul truck drivers invention it's really awesome.
Charles Edler Ryan Abbott if you zoom in and look through the boom you'll see my block 16,000 lbs in a cradle and there's also a spot for the ball.
Mike Dicenzo Charles Edler, I have walked them on the boom tip wheels but has to be perfect conditions , that is all terrain !!
Marvin Roberson Sr. How do you sync the speed without sliding or binding the boom?
Charles Edler Marvin Roberson Sr. He puts it in neutral and I just pull him along we do line pulls mostly not line pushes can cut tracks and make sweeping corners and I stop and he can cut his tracks to adjust.
Kirk Shank Does the buggy free swing?
Charles Edler Kirk Shank yes we make turns while walking.
Allen Dean That ground looks kinda risky to be traveling across with the rocks still on.
Charles Edler Allen Dean had a skid steer and a front end loader/ fork lift dropping steel plates if my heels started digging. We also walked the counterweights all the way forward to the stops with the remote.

An alternative to using a boom buggy is to use a telescopic boom. Mobile cranes are getting huge.
RC KN posted
Liebherr LTM 11200-9-1 on the way to the next windmill#1401

This is the post that motivated the discussion of the Harley tip.
Charles Edler posted
Before we go any further NO THE CRANE IS NOT UNDERBOOMED TO ALL THE KNOW IT ALLS THAT LOVE TO SCRUTINIZE OTHER PEOPLES POSTS ! When I press an option on my screen it makes it where I can fit all the crane in the screen without having to walk another 50 to 100 yards away to get it in the frame it is an illusion rant over lol MLC 650 VPC MAX mode 390.4 main 24.9 Harley tip 415 overall one blade left at site then a line push utilizing 2 boom buggies will try and get pics !
Matthew Shaw What Brand turbines are those?Charles Edler Matthew Shaw Siemens/Gamesa 5 part towers
John Field Charles Edler get your damn boom right brotha and looks to me you have 4 blades left to put up! Why is there 6 blades on site?Charles Edler John Field those 3 are damaged well at least one of them is.ohn Field What the hell you do? Didnt have your boom angle right and smacked into the other blade? LolCharles Edler John Field Somebody ran into it with a fork lift

Sharon vickers posted
Boom buggy #1 in action
Daniel Wilcox We just boom down onto a flat bed and strap down.. or use shackles and cables to the mast..
Chris Greiner considering how much the buggy is tracking in the mud? i wounder what the crane will do? (I'm thinking "titanic")
Michael Newman Chris Greiner hopefully they remove the CW

Chanc Bourdon commented on Sharon's post
[The technique used for line pushes if you don't have a boom buggy.]

Sharon Vickers posted
Boom buggy works great for off road and rough terrain.
Dick Hale Had to walk a 777 across 5th st San Francisco, with a big fork lift holding my tip, under the trolly car wires. That was fun
Rob Shellhamer Interesting rig. Is the boom secured to the buggy or is there some "slop" to account for travel differences between the buggy and the crane?
Sharon Vickers Rob Shellhamer secured.

Sharon Vickers posted two photos with the comment: "Series 2 Boom Buggy and a Manitowoc MLC 650."
hillip Permenter How much boon were y’all runnin?
Charles Edler Phillip Permenter 370.7 main and then the Harley tip 24.9.
1

2


Lucas B Sustich commented on Sharon's post
It worked good for us with an old demag we used to have.
[It looks like they removed the luffer jib before the move.]

Lucas B Sustich commented on Sharon's post

Jason Garland commented on Sharon's post

Sharon Vicker posted five photos with the comment: "Boom buggy #2 loaded and heading out for a demo."
Dan Miles It’s to lay a boom on to walk under bridges and power lines on wind farms it looks like. Not a bad idea. We usually use a semi trailer. But pending how much stick it’s a touchy deal.
[I think buggy #1 was built on an old crane base. This one looks like it was built on a dozer. I wonder what the attachment at the rear is used for.]
1

2

3

4

5

Ben L Reich commented on  Sharon's post
Crawler hydro is the cats meow
Chris Fontenot Ben L Reich and for A and D
Ben L Reich Chris Fontenot that's right. Took us 5 weeks to get our company to get one. So we could assemble the 1600 quicker.
[A and D would be assembly and disassembly. I assume Ben meant 16000 instead of 1600.]

Wade Zeckser commented on  Sharon's post
Semi works just as good
[Not on a muddy field.]

Dustin Shaffer commented on  Sharon's post
How we normally do it.
Sharon Vickers posted two photos with the comment; "Pushing a Manitowoc 650 boom under power lines."
video1
video2 (I wish they would show  video of them raising the boom back up.)
1

2

Dustin Shaffer posted two photos with the comment: "My #1 driver Johnny cash getting ready to walk a 16000 under some power lines Saturday morning."
Ted Fortier Does the truck drive at all or get pushed and only steer?
Dustin Shaffer Ted Fortier just pushed.

1

2

And old fashioned boom buggy:
Quinn Lickman posted seven photos with the comment: "A 4600 Manitowoc crossing a public road with the help of a Cat 980B in 1993."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7