Saturday, January 24, 2026

1953 39mw Tenkiller Dam and OK-100 Bridge over Illinois River near Gore, OK

Dam: (Satellite)
Bridge: (Satellite)
Aux Spillway: (Satellite)
Main Spillway: (Satellite)
Inlet Control Works: (Satellite)
Outlet Works: (Satellite)
Powerhouse: (Satellite)

TownOfGore

USACE_lake


WildlifeDepartment
"Impounded in 1952, Tenkiller is the only controlled impoundment on the Illinois River and can experience prolonged drastic lake level fluctuations....Due to its depth, the lake provides cool water for the popular year-round trout fishery in the tailwaters."
[I did see a lot of photos of people fishing downstream. And there must be bass in the lake. (I didn't watch it.)]

dvidshub
"Photo By Brannen Parrish [USACE provided] | The State Highway 100 Bridge over Tenkiller Dam's main spillway, near Gore, Okla., awaits motorists in the late afternoon sun, Sept. 9, 2025. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District will close the bridge for demolition and replacement starting Oct. 6, 2025. The bridge has served motorists enabling passage over the spillway for more than seven decades."
Demolition and construction is expected to take 2.5 years and cost $28.7m.

The old bridge was a steel girder bridge. I don't know if the new one will be steel or concrete.
USACE_project

I was not able to find an overview photo on any of the USACE web pages, but I did find this drone video. The main spillway is in the center and the aux spillway is on the right. The earth dam is to the left of the aux spillway in the background because the road does a 90-degree bend after the aux spillway.
2:32 video @ 0:08

It looks like the spillway flow is carving off huge blocks of rock. I wonder what type of rock it is.
@ 1:25

But I still don't have an overview of the earth dam, so I'll go with a satellite image. From left to right: powerhouse, outlet works, inlet works, main spillway, aux spillway and earth dam.
Satellite

I had to dig deep, but I finally found that the powerhouse has 2 units for a combined capacity of 39mw. I still don't know the flow rate when the generators are operating. [HydroReform]
Why won't USACE include these numbers on their webpages?

I wish all USACE websites had a graphic like this.
USACE_tenk

GreatFallsTribune
[They have not updated this data to include the aux spillway.]

Spillway and Outlet Works:  The main spillway capacity is 290,400 cubic feet per second (cfs) at maximum pool (elevation 672.2) with flow controlled by ten 50- by 25-foot tainter gates. The auxiliary spillway capacity is 229,340 cfs at maximum pool with flow controlled by five 50- by 35-foot tainter gates. The crest of the main spillway is at elev. 642 and the auxiliary crest is located at elev. 632. A flood control outlet extending through the narrow ridge comprising the right abutment consists of a 19-foot conduit.  Capacity of the conduit is 23,300 cfs at the top of the flood control pool.  Flow through the conduit is controlled by two 9- by 19-foot tractor-type service gates installed at the upstream end of the conduit and operated by individual electric hoists located on the operating floor of the gate tower structure.

Hydrologic Data: Estimated peak discharge and volume of the December 2015 flood were 149,200 cfs and 900,763 acre-feet, respectively. The record peak release was for this flood at 35,000 cfs.  Total runoff from the drainage area above the site was 10.48 inches for the entire period.  The March and April 1945 flood had more total runoff with lower peak flows at 1,184,000 acre-feet and 118,000 cfs, respectively.  Total runoff from the drainage area above the site was 13.79 inches for the entire period.  The May 1950 flood had a peak discharge of 180,000 cfs with a volume of 720,000 acre-feet, which is equal to 8.39 inches of runoff. 

Just 35kcfs makes a big splash.
USACE, Tulsa District posted
"Here's a look above and below Tenkiller Dam at about 3:00 p.m. today [Dec 29, 2015] as they were releasing just under 35,000 cfs after receiving several days of heavy rain throughout the region."

All of the photos I found were of the bridge over the main spillway. Here is a view of the bridge over the aux spillway. No one talks about replacing this bridge. When was the aux spillway built?
Found the construction date: "Construction of the auxiliary spillway was completed in January 2009." [USACE_data]
Street View, Apr 2025

Jan 2026:
David Holeman posted four photos with the comment: "Went by tenkiller dam and took a few more pictures of progress. They got the bridge deck off of it."
1

2

3

4

1961,1979 2.6gw Chief Joseph Dam and Rufus Woods Lake on Columbia River at Bridgeport, WA

(Satellite)

Street View, May 2023

Columbia Basin Research, Image Source: USACE Digital Visual Library. Image File Number: 4900-19. Photographer: Unknown. Date: 1/1/81.
Units 1-16 were constructed in 1961 with a nameplate capacity of 64mw and an overload capacity of 88.3mw.
Units 17-27 were added in 1979 with a nameplate capacity of 95mw and an overload capacity of 109.3mw.
The hydraulic capacity is 219kcfs.
The spillway is 980' (299m) long with 19 gates.

USACE
"Chief Joseph Dam is the second largest hydropower producing dam in the United States."

USACE_hydropower
"Chief Joseph Dam is a 'run of the river' dam which means the lake behind the dam is not able to store large amounts of water. Water coming to Chief Joseph Dam from Grand Coulee Dam must be passed on to Wells Dam at approximately the same rate. With 27 main generators in the powerhouse, it has the hydraulic capacity of 213,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), or 1,593,000 gallons per second.    In the event more water was passed on to Chief Joseph Dam than could be used for power generation, the spillway gates would be opened to pass the excess water. With an average annual flow rate of 108,000 cfs, the Columbia River seldom exceeds the powerplant's capability to pass water. Spilling of water is infrequent at Chief Joseph Dam."

USACE, Seattle District posted
“What the heck am I looking at here?” A lot of hydropower is what. 
It doesn’t look like much to the untrained eye, but this is a "busy" photo of Chief Joseph Dam’s powerhouse. 
Extensive capital improvement work is currently underway at Chief Joseph, near Bridgeport, Wash. on the Columba River.
Seattle District operates and manages USACE’s largest hydropower project and the Nation’s second largest hydropower producing dam. (We like to gloat.)
Zoom in a little and you can see two upper brackets stacked on top of Units 3 & 4, while our General Electric contractors simultaneously work the generator rewind project on Units 7 & 10. 
Also, there's a tiny human for scale near the bottom left, because these units are massive!
Just another day to ensure clean, reliable hydropower makes it to the power grid.

They had to dig a huge power canal on the side of the river in order to get a powerhouse that was long enough to handle the flow of the river. So the spillway is effectively a huge diversion dam.
SpokaneHistorical

Thomas O'Keefe Flickr via hydroreform
hydroreform specifies a capacity of 2.5gw and an annual net output of 11,239gwh.

And this specifies a capacity of 2.6mw. They must be upgrading the units.
USACE, Seattle District 0:25 video
Chief Joseph Dam is the nation’s second leading producer of hydropower, capable of producing over 2,600 megawatts (MW) of electricity – enough to power the Seattle metro area.
Its discharge outflow on the day of this video was approximately 250,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) or 12 MILLION gallons per minute. That’s enough to fill about 170 Olympic sized pools in a minute!
[Or one pool in 2.8 seconds.]

The dam does not have a fish ladder, and the blockage of fish is an issue.

Ohio & Erie Canal Locks #48 and #49 near Rushtown, OH

Lock #48: (Satellite)
Lock 48 Label: (Satellite, I include this location error because of the photos on Google Maps.)
Lock #49: (Satellite)

Ohio & Erie Canal Overview

Rose Anable posted three photos with the comment: "There is part of the Ohio & Erie Canal system just north of Portsmouth in Rushtown. Lock #48.  You can see where the canal system went southward . The lock is to the right ."
Dennis DeBruler: Found it: https://maps.app.goo.gl/E4wdrkgoCHQxHDVZ8. I noticed that Lock #49 is in Rushtown, https://maps.app.goo.gl/g7mYXpbEduw6e2Bp9.
1

2

3

When I looked for a satellite image on Google Earth that had fewer leaves on the trees, I discovered that at least the trees were removed from around the locks between Oct 2006 and Aug 2009. It is good that someone is uncovering the history of the O&E Canal.

The 1913 abandonment of the canal was recent enough that it is still marked as an abandoned canal on this 1915 map. I recognize 1913 as the year of a bad flood that cause most of the Ohio canals to be abandoned. The railroad was the Norfolk & Western.
1915/58 Otway Quad @ 62,500

lynn thomas, Apr 2025

This is the first lock I found because it is in Rushtown.
Satellite

But when I found this map, I learned that that lock was Lock #49.
OhioDNR, file OE&192-73

I got file 193-73 next. But I discovered that the Scioto County files are numbered from north to south (but listed south to north), so I got file 191-73 to find Lock #48. I think the "county road" in the lower-right corner is today's McDermott Pond Creek Road (OH-46).
OhioDNR, file OE&191-73

Friday, January 23, 2026

1853 (6th)-1870 + 1938,1983 (8th) Chain Bridges over Potomac River at Arlington, VA

1853: (Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; HAER)
1938: (Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; Satellite)

1853 (6th) Bridge


ArchivedBridgeHunter_1853
"Sixth bridge at this location, derives its name from the third bridge, a chain suspension bridge. First bridge built by Timothy Palmer for Georgetown Bridge Co., wooden covered bridge opened 1797, rotted and collapsed 1804. Rebuilt by Georgetown Bridge Co. in kind, washed away by flood after six months. Third bridge opened 1810, chain suspension span 136' long, 15' wide designed by Judge James E. Finley of Uniontown, PA, swept away by flood 1812; fourth span damaged 1815 by floods; fifth span built 1840 and also destroyed by flooding. Sixth bridge wooden covered span of seven spans, Howe truss with arches, uncovered during Civil War to prevent arson, washed out 1870."

Images of Yore posted
View down the Chain Bridge over the Potomac near Washington circa 1865. (by William Morris Smith)

1937 (8th) Bridge


D.C. Dept of Highways, 1948 via BridgeHunter_1937

Wikimedia via ArchivedBridgeHunter_1938, License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA)
"Eighth bridge at this location, derives its name from the third bridge, a chain suspension bridge....Army engineers built iron truss replacement 1874, weakened by 1936 flood and replaced with current girder bridge."

I imagine that a steel girder bridge of that magnitude would have been bleeding edge in 1938. Most 1930s bridges are steel trusses.

Aridane Rodríguez, Jul 2023

Manuela Costescu, Nov 2021

History of Oil Production and Crude Oil Products

I also have some notes on the history of the retail side of the oil business.

Pennsylvania History Buff posted
August 27, 1859 - Petroleum is discovered in Titusville, PA, leading to the world's first commercially successful oil well.
** Below is a photo of Edwin L. Drake, right, standing with friend Peter Wilson at the drilling site of the first commercial oil well in Titusville, PA.

That well has been preserved in the Drake Well Museum & Park.
Ronald MacDonald, Mar 2023

The world's largest refinery, Eclipse Oil, was built a little downriver in Franklin, PA.
𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻: 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗹𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮 and Ohio posted via Dennis DeBruler

1959: Drakes First Oil Well
I knew that Col Edwin Drake drilled the first oil well in 1959 near Titusville, PA. What I did not know is that nearby Pithole City surpassed all the other oil boomtowns in area.
For about 500 days beginning in 1865, Pithole City, named for nearby Pithole Creek, became a town of up to 20,000 drillers, speculators, roustabouts, muleskinners and the usual cast of characters sucked in by the gravitational pull of oil and money.
Hotels, bars, banks, music halls, boarding houses, bawdy houses, even a church or two were thrown up overnight on leased land with the cheapest of materials. The world’s first oil pipeline was built connecting the Pithole oil fields to the new railroad depot a few miles away, putting thousands of muleskinners and wagon drivers out of business (after a few attacks on the pipeline, of course).
The post office was the third-busiest in the state, behind Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. The Pithole Daily Record newspaper kept residents abreast of the latest oil strikes. [www.dispatch.com]
Canvas Art posted
America’s first oil field, Titusville, Pennsylvania. Photograph by John Mather, c.1859. Source: Archive Photos via Getty Images
Did you know Colonel Edwin Drake, a prominent New York entrepreneur, is credited with drilling the first oil well in the United States. This historic event took place in 1859, situated at the intersection of Oil Creek and Pioneer Run, southeast of Erie. Subsequently, during the mid-1860s, numerous other wells began to dot the landscape in that vicinity. Note the signage for the intriguingly named, The Shoe & Leather Petroleum Company.
Emily Weaver: There are some inaccuracies with this post. Drake's Well was drilled alongside Oil Creek in Cherrytree Township, Venango County. It was NOT at the "intersection of Oil Creek and Pioneer Run." The image in this post is of Pioneer, an oil boom town that eventually became a ghost town. Pioneer was located south of Titusville...so to say this is an image of a "Titusville oil field" is not accurate....unless you were just trying to generalize the area and say that anything within 15 to 30 minutes of Titusville was a "Titusville oil field."
Also Edwin Drake was far from a "prominent entrepreneur." His employers could have held that title as they were entrepreneurs - not all from New York though. Drake was a train conductor who was on medical leave and selected by the Seneca Oil Company because he had a free railroad pass (and a few other things). He was sent to Titusville by the company to drill a well on their property. I strongly recommend that you visit Drake Well Museum and Park or go to www.drakewell.org.
Gary McCall: Emily Weaver And the well was drilled by William A. Smith.
Tom Doyle: The well was drilled on the Kingsley Farm below Watsons Flats, Thats not always mentioned much in the History , And Emily is correct on this picture , Pioneer was closer to Petroleum Center than the Drake well.
History Photo's posted
Photograph: America’s first oil field, Titusville, Pennsylvania. Photograph by John Mather, c.1859. Source: Archive Photos via Getty Images
Did you know Colonel Edwin Drake, a prominent New York entrepreneur, is credited with drilling the first oil well in the United States. This historic event took place in 1859, situated at the intersection of Oil Creek and Pioneer Run, southeast of Erie. Subsequently, during the mid-1860s, numerous other wells began to dot the landscape in that vicinity. Note the signage for the intriguingly named, The Shoe & Leather Petroleum Company.

But the oil quickly ran out and the town disappeared. But there is a historical site.

The picture of barrels reminds me that during most of the 1800s, tank cars had not been invented. A shipper could choose boxcars, gondolas, or flatcars.

1901: First Texas Oil Well
In this article pause the video and just read the text. The video, after a painfully long commercial, is about all sorts of things that happened on Jan 10. The article describes the discovery of oil at Spindletop. By 1901, Rockefeller had created his monopoly by buying most of the wells in Pennsylvania, Ohio. etc. But after this Jan 10, 1901 gusher proved there was a lot of oil in Texas, new wells were brought online faster than Rockefeller could buy them. Companies formed in Texas ("Humble (now Exxon), the Texas Company (Texaco) and Magnolia Petroleum Company (Mobil)") that could compete with Standard Oil after it was broke up. In the 1800s, oil was used for kerosene in lamps and refined for lubricants of the many machines that were built in the 1800s as part of the industrial revolution. But the invention of the electric light bulb killed the market for kerosene. Fortunately for the oil companies, the development of the internal combustion engine around the turn of the century created an even bigger market for oil.

By the 1950s, the Spindletop fields had been drained. And foreign companies in the Middle East and elsewhere discovered big reserves. In the 1970s, they organized OPEC and could control the supply of oil. Not only did the price of gas go up, filling stations limited the amount of gas they would pump. I remember sitting in a long line on a street during the few hours that a station was open hoping I would get through the line before the station closed. Thank goodness, at that time, my commute to work was just 1 mile rather than 30 miles to a Chicago office. Portable terminals had yet to be developed so working from home was not an option.

The higher prices that OPEC forced on the world made secondary oil recovery and new exploration economical in US. Russia also started exporting oil in significant quantities. And the Alaska pipeline helped break the OPEC monopoly.

But the booming economy in China and the rest of the world made supplies tight again and we saw gas prices over $4.00. Then we had the recession of 2008, the development of shale oil fracking and Canadian oil sands. But why the prices stayed high for years than collapsed in a time peroid of weeks continues to confuse me because the new production of shale oil and oil sands took at least a couple of years to ramp up. Why didn't the price come down slowly as the additional supplies were put online? Various wars in the Middle East would move the price a few dimes, but they don't account for the price falling 50%. Saudia Arabia refusing to cut output had an impact on the fall. But I assume they kept their output the same as the new wells came online, so that doesn't account for the sudden drop. Maybe the announcement by Saudi Arabia that they won't cut output because they wanted to hold market share spooked the oil traders into realizing the world's oversupply was permanent. 

When we were seeing gas prices over $4, the price-per-barrel of raw crude was over $100 (peaked at $107.95 in June 2014). That price bottomed below $30 in February, 2016. [June, 2016, BlackSwans]

But we may never see the price go above $60 again. One reason is that at $60/barrel, it becomes economic to restart development of most shale fields and oil sands. [Financial Times] The graph below is rather fascinating. I noticed Onshore Opec is $40. But then I noticed that this is an average. Is Saudi Arabia significantly below that or have they already drilled all of the cheaper wells? I also note that the Bakken field is one of the more expensive shale-oil fields, and it is more expensive than oil sands. I wonder where BP's deepwater development  in the Gulf of Mexico would have been on this chart if they did not have the blowout. Also, how deep is Brazil and Angola's wells compared to what BP was trying to drill? I've seen an article about how many wells in the North Sea are going to have to be decommissioned in the upcoming decades. Evidently that field is getting played out and the economics of "Europe shallow water" is becoming worse. I wonder if the North Slope of Alaska is one of the unlabeled offshore dots. And I would like to know which dot(s) represent Russia.
Financial Times

[Peak Oil Demand] did not teach me much. But it did get me to thinking about where does the price of oil go from $50? Saudi and Russia can't let it go back down to $30 again because they were reminded that their economy is now too dependent on oil income. They had to cancel/postpone some of their big-buck projects. If they hold it at $50, they would crush deepwater producers, half the shale fields, Europe shallow water, and oil sands production. But if they put that much production out of business, prices would go way up again. That would drive people to the alternatives such as E85, especially since cellulosic ethanol has been developed; wind (although I have read that most of the good wind locations have already been developed); solar (maybe, I don't think any of the companies that the Federal Government poured money into had any success); more efficient cars; propane and/or LPG locomotives, trucks and buses; people moving back to the city and using public transportation; cities reusing rail infrastructure by adding light-rail lines; ride sharing; an unsustainable global GDP growth [Growth Decline]; reduction of brick-and-mortar activities: working from home with "hotel" space in the office, 3D-printing, not hanging out in a mall, etc. [Third Industrial Revolution]; etc. Too many viable alternatives, would crash the oil industry. Cheap natural gas as an alternative to coal for electric power plants along with another round of environmental regulations has made the coal industry an example of how quickly an industry can collapse. (The last deep-pit mine in England has closed. They still have surface mines, but a big factor in the closure of deep-pit mines was the increase of imports. [BBC] All of the large, publicly listed American coal companies have filed for bankruptcy: Peabody Energy, Arch Coal, Alpha Natural Resources, Patriot Coal and Walter Energy. [WSJ])

I just recently read that sales are down in malls because teenagers are no longer going there to "hang out." They spend their time on social media in their room rather than go to the mall. And how many now stream a movie rather than go to a movie theater? In the 1950s, when gas was really cheap, teenagers used to cruise on Friday and Saturday nights and go to drive-in movie theaters.

Also, Americans have demonstrated that gas prices have some elastic. They switch between buying hulking SUVs and trucks vs.  small and hybrid cars depending on the price of gas. And soon electric cars may be a viable alternative. Florida, Las Vegas, and the airlines learned that Americans will find places to visit that are closer to home when the price goes up. They even coined the term "staycations." That is, skipping the annual travel vacation and finding something different/interesting to do near home.

A couple of years ago, I bought my third minivan, and it has flex-fuel. I started using E85 because gas was around $3 and E85 was just less than $2. But when the price of gas went below $2, E85 still stayed in the $1.90s. I figured out that E85 needs to be less than 80% of the price of gas to be more economical because of the reduced gas mileage. So I quit looking at E85 prices. But when I noticed that E85 was down to $1.40s, I started looking again. At my last fill up, gas was $2.39 and E85 was $1.69. 80% of 2.39 is 1.91, so I bought E85 again. I wonder what percentage of the engines on the road now are flex-fuel. Unfortunately, I just read that using ethanol causes the intake valves to become dirty. When I am in Kentucky, I do buy Shell because it is competitively priced down there. And I got my best gas mileage ever (30 mpg in a minivan travelling a 79 mph) when I had a tank of Shell. Hopefully, its additives will keep my intake valves clean.

I wrote the above several years ago. This draft got kinda lost. Now, Aug 2023, gas is above $4 again. But I don't know why. We have had some general inflation, the past few years, but I don't think accounts for the increase.

Industrial Engineering World posted
Crude Oil Products with Different Temperature 
[Now, if they start with tar sands from Canada instead of liquid crude oil, they get petcoke at the bottom instead of asphalt.]
Dave Durham shared
Chemistry : The Mystery of Molecules posted
Jimmy McCauley posted
Justin Biscoe: They haven't used fractional distillation since before world war 2... Molecular cracking is how it's done now.
Ken Newman: Justin Biscoe distill then crack.
Justin Biscoe: Ken Newman not really, you limit your choices, the reason why we crack is because we get more petrol than the otherwise would and this is become more important over the years, and less black sludge which is only useful for tarmac, the modern solvents are easier to synthesize from methane than wasting it from distilling crude.
Martin Hardy: Justin Biscoe Does the cracking process mean that to obtain a certain amount of petrol you don't need to refine a proportionate amount of diesel as a by-product? I had the understanding that if petrol demand rises faster than diesel demand than the refining process would lead to a glut of cheap diesel? Does the cracking process mean that actual market demands for petrol and diesel can now be met without over-production of diesel as a by-product of petrol ?

Illinois Petroleum Resources Board posted
Did you know? The Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association's latest State of Energy report shows Illinois ranks 9th in the United States in total oil and natural gas industry jobs. TIPRO projects the Illinois upstream, midstream and downstream oil and gas industries combined to generate $23.7 billion in gross regional product in 2022 and directly employ 20,431 people. TIPRO shows that Illinois added 362 oil and gas industry jobs in 2022, including 93 exploration and production industry jobs (Note: the latter figure does not include independent contractors, which have traditionally accounted for about half of Illinois' exploration and production industry jobs). Check out IPRB's updated Illinois Oil and Natural Gas Industry By the Numbers infographic for more facts on the state's oil and gas industry.

Illinois Petroleum Resources Board posted
Did you know? The United States consumes more than 20 MILLION barrels of oil per day. Here’s a breakdown of how that 20+ Million BPD was consumed in 2022 by refined petroleum product.
 Find out more here: https://iprb.org/industry-facts/petroleum-products/

Thursday, January 22, 2026

1842,1885 Erie Canal Lock #19 and Whipple Truss Bridge over the Canal near Vischer Ferry, NY

Lock: (Satellite)
Bridge: (Satellite)


This bridge provides access to the Vischer Ferry Nature & Historic Preserve.

The double chamber lock was built in 1842 during the enlargement of the Erie Canal and the chamber on the right was lengthened in 1885. 
AJ Richbart, May 2014

This satellite image shows the bridge we see in AJ's photo above. The bridge is over the south chamber, so the above upstream view is looking West. That means it was the north chamber that got enlarged. That is very unusual because most locks enlarged the south chamber to expedite the handling of heavy 250-ton barges loaded with grain that were eastbound.
Satellite

jim catalfamo, Mar 2021

This is a good view of the steps that are built into the central divider on the downstream side of the chambers.
Ryan Naylor, Aug 2021

It looks like a much-needed trimming of nature was done between 2021 and 2024.
Theresa St. John, Sep 2024

In 2005, the chambers had obviously been neglected, but very little is growing out of the walls.
ErieCanal
"Enlarged Erie Canal Lock no. 19, looking west -- taken Nov. 2005."

A chainsaw is an important preservation tool.
ErieCanal
"Enlarged Erie Canal Lock 19, looking west -- taken Sept. 22, 2012."

Joel Torres posted seven photos with the comment: "Enlarged Erie Canal [LOCK19]"
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Hudson River Lightkeeper posted five images with the comment: "Celebrating 200 Years of the Erie Canal 1825-2025.    Vischer Ferry"
1

2

3

4

5

Whipple Truss Bridge


Theresa St. John, Sep 2024

Theresa St. John, Sep 2024

jim catalfamo, Mar 2021

Theresa St. John, Sep 2024
Digitally Zoomed