Saturday, February 7, 2026

1938,1994,2020 Arrigoni and 1910 PW/NYNH&H Bridges over Connecticut River between Middletown and Portland, CT

1938: (Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; Historic BridgesSatellite)

PW = Providence & Worcester
NYNH&H = New York, New Haven & Hartford

1938 Arrigoni Bridge


User Denimadept via Wikipedia via ArchivedBridgeHunter_1938, License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA)

I tried to frame the Arrigoni Bridge with the NYNH&H Swing Bridge.
Boat View, Aug 2019

Taylor Hunt, Oct 2022

HistoricBridges
This 3428' (1045m) long bridge has two 600' (183m) spans.

Historic Bridge Foundation posted 11 photos with the comment:
The Arrigoni Bridge stands as one of Connecticut’s most important engineering landmarks and one of the most significant steel arch bridges constructed in the United States during the late 1930s. Spanning the Connecticut River between Middletown and Portland, the bridge represents a rare convergence of structural innovation, economic necessity, aesthetic ambition, and historical timing. Completed in 1938, the bridge was constructed during the final years of the Great Depression, when public infrastructure projects served not only transportation needs but also national recovery efforts and technological advancement.
More than a river crossing, the Arrigoni Bridge symbolizes a turning point in American bridge design, reflecting both the maturity of steel arch construction and the evolving relationship between engineering efficiency and architectural form.
Prior to the Arrigoni Bridge, the primary river crossing between Middletown and Portland consisted of an aging swing bridge that had become increasingly inadequate for modern traffic. Repeated flooding of the Connecticut River exposed the vulnerability of the old structure, with high-water events regularly disrupting transportation and commerce. The river itself, a vital navigable waterway, further complicated matters by requiring substantial vertical clearance for shipping.
By the mid-1930s, it had become clear that replacement—not rehabilitation—was the only viable solution. 
The Arrigoni Bridge was designed as a twin tied-arch bridge, a configuration that allowed the structure to span the wide Connecticut River without the need for massive masonry abutments or extensive falsework in the water. The tied-arch system transfers horizontal thrust forces into the deck itself rather than into the foundations, an essential advantage given the river’s width and soil conditions.
Each of the two main steel arches spans approximately 600 feet, making the bridge the longest highway crossing in Connecticut at the time of its completion. The roadway deck is suspended from the arches by vertical hangers, allowing the arch ribs to rise gracefully above the river while maintaining a relatively shallow structural depth below the deck.
The engineering challenges were substantial. According to Engineering News-Record’s August 25, 1938 feature on major bridge completions, the erection of the Arrigoni Bridge required the development of an innovative cable tieback system that allowed the arch halves to be cantilevered outward from the piers without extensive temporary falsework in the river channel 
This method dramatically reduced construction risk, minimized obstruction to navigation, and represented a major advancement in long-span erection techniques.
The success of this approach placed the Arrigoni Bridge among the most technically sophisticated bridges of its era.
Construction began in 1936 under the direction of the Connecticut Highway Commission. Steel fabrication was performed by Bethlehem Steel, one of the dominant structural steel producers of the period. The bridge’s erection sequence—documented in detail by contemporary engineering journals—demonstrated the increasing precision of 20th-century structural analysis.
Rather than relying on massive timber falsework towers rising from the riverbed, engineers erected each arch half outward from the piers using temporary cables anchored behind the structure. As segments were added, cable tensions were adjusted incrementally to maintain precise geometry. Once the two arch halves met at midspan, the structure became self-supporting and the temporary systems were removed.
This method dramatically reduced construction materials, shortened the schedule, and eliminated the hazards associated with river-based scaffolding. At the time, it was considered a textbook example of modern cantilever erection practice.
The bridge opened to traffic on August 6, 1938, at a total cost of approximately $3.5 million, a substantial but justified investment during the Depression era.
Beyond its structural efficiency, the Arrigoni Bridge possesses exceptional visual elegance. The sweeping steel arches rise prominently above the Connecticut River, forming one of the most recognizable silhouettes in the state. Unlike earlier heavy masonry arch bridges or utilitarian truss crossings, the Arrigoni Bridge reflects a growing belief that infrastructure should contribute positively to the visual landscape.
The bridge’s proportions—long horizontal deck balanced by tall, slender arches—create a sense of lightness despite its immense scale. The structure harmonizes with the wide river valley rather than dominating it, an intentional design goal emphasized by its engineers.
This aesthetic philosophy aligns with broader trends of the 1930s, when civil engineers increasingly embraced the idea that beauty could be achieved through structural clarity rather than ornamentation. The Arrigoni Bridge exemplifies this principle.
From a national perspective, the Arrigoni Bridge occupies an important position in the evolution of American steel arch bridges. It represents the mature phase of tied-arch design prior to World War II, combining advanced analytical methods with construction experience gained from earlier projects such as the Hell Gate Bridge and the Bayonne Bridge.
Unlike experimental structures, the Arrigoni Bridge demonstrated that long-span tied arches could be built efficiently, economically, and safely for highway use. The techniques refined during its construction influenced subsequent arch bridges throughout the United States in the 1940s and 1950s.
Few bridges of this era remain so intact today.
Today, the Arrigoni Bridge remains in active service more than eighty-five years after its opening. Despite carrying traffic volumes far beyond those anticipated by its designers, the structure continues to perform reliably, a testament to the quality of its materials and engineering.
Its preservation is significant for several reasons:
• It is one of the longest and most important Depression-era bridges in Connecticut
• It represents a rare surviving example of early tied-arch highway design
• It retains exceptional historic integrity
• It stands as a physical record of 1930s construction methods
Unlike many historic bridges that have been replaced or heavily altered, the Arrigoni Bridge continues to convey its original engineering intent and visual character.
The Arrigoni Bridge is far more than a crossing of the Connecticut River. It is a monument to American engineering at a pivotal moment in history—when innovation, necessity, and public purpose aligned to produce infrastructure of lasting value.
Its elegant twin arches, advanced erection techniques, and enduring service life place it among the most significant bridges in New England. As documented in contemporary engineering literature and proven through decades of performance, the bridge exemplifies the highest ideals of civil engineering: efficiency, durability, beauty, and service to society.
For Connecticut and for the broader field of historic bridge preservation, the Arrigoni Bridge stands as a reminder that infrastructure, when thoughtfully designed and well built, can transcend utility to become lasting cultural heritage.
Don Wurst: It also won the AISC "Most beautiful bridge" award.
Roy Guild: The design, engineering and construction of the bridge span were excellent. The Political pressures at the time caused the approach’s to the span on both sides of the river to be turned on to the main streets rather than continuing in a straight line and connecting with Rt. 66 near the railroad crossings on Portland - cobalt rd and Washington street. This has restricted the traffic flow across the span and choked both Main Streets.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11


1910 PW/NYNH&H Bridge


User Denimadept via Widipedia via ArchivedBridgeHunter_1910, License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA)

Boat View, Aug 2019

2014 photo by Chester Gehman via BridgeHunter_1910

1901 Closed Bolivia Road Bridge over Sangamon River near Bolivia, IL

(Archived Bridge Hunter; Bridge Hunter; Historic Bridges; Satellite)

Note that there is a short pony truss span at the far end.
Photo by Dale Travis via BridgeHunter

2012 photo by Fmiser via BridgeHunter

Lois Munson posted three photos and three videos with the comment:
Historic Bridge in Illinois 
Sangamon/Christian County
Built 1901
One of only 6 remaining Parker Through Truss bridges in Illinois
With Pony Pratt Through Truss approach.
Beautiful and unusual details that are rare on this type of bridge .
Bolivia Road Bridge 
(if you google, you can find many more pictures and posts)
My pics and videos have snow.
Last photo by Nathan Holth
Ronald R. Turner: Another point about this bridge, or moreso its name and the name of the village nearby that it is named for.
In that area, the village's name is pronounced "BAH-liv-ee." A local resident told me that, and I did not know what to think!
1

2

3

This makes it obvious that it is a pin-connected truss.
Screenshot from the first video posted by Lois

Friday, February 6, 2026

IL-82 Lost 1902 Bridge #37 over Hennepin Canal and Lost Truss Bridge over Green River near Geneseo, IL

Green: (Satellite)


Green River Bridge


This truss is not pin connected because I can see some gusset plates.
Geneseo Current posted
Photo Flashback: January 1969 - Water encroaches on the old Route 82 bridge over a flooded Green River.

Canal Bridge #37


This truss is pin connected.
The Dispatch, May 5, 1973 via BridgeHunter


They not only remove the old truss bridges, but they also remove the embankments that raised the bridge so that canal boats could pass beneath.
Street View, Aug 2025

1857 4th Street Covered Bridge over Juniata River burned Sep 20, 1930, in Huntingdon, PA

(no Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; Satellite)

Jackson-Township historical preservation posted
4th Street Covered Bridge over the Juniata River in Huntingdon borough destroyed by fire on September 20, 1930.  The bridge was originally constructed in 1857.

I wonder what replaced the wood bridge. This looks too modern for 1930.
Street View, Aug 2023

Thursday, February 5, 2026

Daylighted/N&W/Pittsburgh & West Virginia Copeland Tunnel near Hopedale, OH

Tunnel: (Satellite)
Cut: (Satellite)

The tunnel is on the left and the cut that replaced it is on the right.
Street View, Oct 2018

Mark Farm posted 11 photos with the comment: "Hopedale, Ohio."
David Savick: Looks like narrow gauge rails
Steven Myers: They pulled the standard gage rails and left the guardrails. Tie plates still spiked to ties at standard gage width.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Mark Svetlich commented on  his post
Copeland Tunnel

Mark Svetlich commented on  his post
[As part of a discussion as to how he gained access to the tunnel, Mark posted this photo of the other end.]

AJ DeJulius posted
A long US 22 between Casiz and Hopedale, Ohio, you'll see a closed off tunnel on the right side of the road(pictured here) always been curious of what the tunnel was for. Any information?
Thomas Kinney: The railroad track directly to the right used to go through it, but there were geologic instabilities, so they bypassed the tunnel and blocked it up. Fun Fact: I am actually on US 22, and just passed over the tunnel as I am writing this! [He explained in another comment that he was a passenger.]
Tommy Emery: I used to live in the area
They closed the tunnel and rerouted the line due to the tunnel having structural issues
Wm Pedly: Fun fact, President Lincoln passed through that tunnel on his bid for the presidency. He stopped in some small town nearby and talked to the residents. A buddy and I climbed the dirt pile used to close it off, and went through a hole in the top where the stacks would blow the coal smoke. inside you wouldn't believe the bats and the daddy long leg spiders. Still in incredible shape with old brick work and stone work. Very wet and somewhat dangerous and tricky to get to. Great piece of history.
Geoff Elliott: The tunnel was open when I was young. Don't think it was closed up until the 1990s.

I couldn't find the tunnel until it occurred to me that it must have been daylighted by the time this map was made. Then I read the above comments that confirmed that they dug a cut to bypass the tunnel.
I have never heard of the Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad. It was merged into the N&W in 1964. [Dennis DeBruler]
1960/62 Cadiz Quad @ 24,000

Nature had yet to invade the cut in 1994.
Google Earth, Mar 1994

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

1933,1988 Rudy Minarcin Bridge over Kiskiminetas River at Vandergrift, PA

(Archived Bridge HunterBridge Hunter; Historic BridgesSatellite)

Jackson-Township historical preservation posted
Bridge partially under water at the town of Vandergrift, Westmoreland County during the Great Flood of 1936.

It was this pier that was under water.
Street View, Jun 2025

Kudos to PennDOT for maintaining a truss bridge.
Street View, Jun 2025

BridgeHunter
The span is 311' (95m) long. The bridge was built in 1933 and rehabilitated in 1988.

Some comments indicate that the water was as high as the roof at Niki's. If the store was down by the stop light, I could easily believe it. But this store is up on a hill.
Street View, Jun 2025

The steel mill has a couple of contour lines between it and the river so hopefully the river level didn't reach it. It also shows that North Vandergrift is in a flood plain.
1953/55 Vandergrift Quad @ 24,000

In fact, this view shows that the mill is on a bluff. The bridge in the left background is the subject of these notes.
Andrew Stewart posted via Dennis DeBruler