Showing posts with label landTransport. Show all posts
Showing posts with label landTransport. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2022

I-95 Express Lane Improvements in South Florida

(Satellite, I'm guessing the bridge move below was done here.)

They are "expanding the number of Express and High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on the highway." And they are adding tolls to the express lanes. The work began in 2008 starting in downtown Miami. They are now working on the third phase, which is in the Fort Lauderdale area. And the bridge over Hillsboro Canal was replaced to provide a higher clearance for boats. To add room for the extra express lanes, some of the interchanges had to be rebuilt. [ConstructionEquipmentGuide]

I think the following move was done at the SR-84 interchange. I-95 was completely closed so that they could move the new bridges into place using SPMTs. [CBSlocal]
Mammoet posted two photos with the comment:
While it may be vacation time for some in Florida, Mammoet has been keeping busy by installing a new bridge in Ft. Lauderdale. 
We removed the old Bridge in Ft. Lauderdale last May and returned again to finish up the project. Kudos to all teams involved particularly our operators, project managers, and engineers who are getting it done ahead of schedule and without incident. 
Learn more about our civil related scopes, here: https://mmoet.me/3dCVaVt
Dennis DeBruler
Was this the Apr 2-3 work at the SR-84 interchange?
1

2

Facts via 95express

Friday, June 11, 2021

Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMTs)

I've accumulated enough example of SPMTs in action that it is time to publish. As with many of my posts, I'll continue to add material as I come across it.

I'll let an article and a brochure explain what they are. (Update: Mammoet's description including their brochure.)
Bay Crane posted
[An example of crab steering]

Mammoet posted
#Mammoet is pleased to announce we have been awarded the factory to foundation scope involving the transport of three vessels from #Italy to the #USA, with the heaviest of the vessels projected to weigh 320t. Because of the early involvement of our team, Mammoet has been able to provide our client with a turnkey transport and engineering solution. Stay tuned to learn more about this project!

To learn more about similar factory to foundation services previously done, click here: http://ow.ly/3vxp50DeYPP



The link in the caption has readable content. One takeaway is that the ramps for RO-RO ships can be dangerous because they are more flexible than roads.
eager.one-stability
 
eager.one-calculating

eager.one-ast-rule

Mammoet posted
#Mammoet's crew recently assisted in the removal of the old 1633t (3.6 million lb.) 4th Street North bridge overpass over I-275 in #Florida using #SPMTs. The entire operation was completed ahead of schedule, allowing the bridge to reopen earlier than anticipated.
#movebymammoet #civilconstruction
Chris Banis: Mammoet so busy we have rented everyone else’s equipment.
Luke Fryou: Look like a Saren transporter And mammoet powerpack.
[Note the eight jacks used to lift the bridge off it abutment.]

MiningLink posted
[This mine is in Austrailia.]

A video of relocating equipment up to 690 metric tons in a mine. It has the modern format of a bunch of short clips, which I hate. Especially since many of the clips are so close to the equipment as to be meaningless. Another aspect of the current video format fad that I hope soon dies. But some clips do show how the wheels can do coordinated turns. But I never did figure out what the gantry equipment did until I paused "at the end of day 2."

SPMTs are used for local moves such as on a shipping dock. For transport on the road, it looks like they still use many wheels. But they replace the power modules with some serious horsepower.
Photo from factory-to-foundation

Willy Hwm Weijenberg posted four photos with the comment: "Vietnam."
[Whenever I see them moving something this big, I wonder what type of cranes are used to set them upright at their destination.]
1

2

3

4

Willy Hwm Weijenberg posted
[Do they pump water out of the ship as the load is rolled onto it to keep the ramps between the ship and the dock fairly level?]



Screenshot
[Moving 7,100t with five lines of SPMTs on a purpose-built road that was 66m wide and 23 km long. "With 290 axle lines of SPMT required to lift and transport the plant, the move also represented the most SPMT axles used in Africa to date and one of the largest moves of a single piece of mining equipment in the world."]

Mammoet posted two photos with the comment: "Did you know we can move our #PTC by loading it onto SPMTs for transport? This method saves time and minimizes disruption to a busy job site - not to mention it's also a pretty impressive sight!"
1

2

Screenshot @ 0:26
[This view caught the axles going up and down in order to keep the load level over the ramp.]

TorontoDrydock
Handling a load from the Coastal Titan.

Mammoet posted three photos with the comment:
748 axle lines of SPMT. 20,300t of vessel. [I wonder what fraction of the SPMTs that Mammoet owned was used for this move.]
Today, we take a look back at the double record-breaking load-in of the Curlew FPSO.
1

2

3
 
mammoet
[The article never used the word "complex". I got sick and tired of hearing that word in the Francis Scott Key Bridge Recovery videos. But the PR person did manage to include the words: "Safety was our first priority." Someday, I'm going to put together a scorecard for PR platitudes.]
 
Crane Operator posted
Amazing cable reel amazing spmt s
Sander Loomeijer: Saipem
[I'm trying to imagine what kind of ship would use this windless.]

2:38 video @ 1:02

So they got it turned. Then what? You can't put that on a truck. The video claims they are moving 15k tons. Fortunately, a comment explained that is what the crane will be rated to lift. These beams are much lighter.
0:57 Facebook video @ 0:32
UNILAD Tech: For more information, check out: https://www.youtube.com/@bokookcorp

Literally, a bigger picture. I guess those beams are going to be part of a crane for that dock. In the background as the ship came into this dock I was amazed at how much infrastructure Singapore has.
5:16 video @ 3:56

Six photos of a move that used 604 axle-lines of SPMT to load-out a 16,258t main support frame (MSF). (I think a MSF is the guts of an oil production platform.) That was a new record.

Two photos of a move that used 496 axle-lines to move a module but the project used up to 1,578 axle-lines to keep multiple modules moving.  A video about that project (The modules are about the size of a football field and up to 200' tall. Decent visuals happened during the second and third minute. There were some more at 5:08.)









Tuesday, June 2, 2020

36-Axle Schnabel car moves nuclear vessel to disposal site

I have some general notes on the Schnabel cars. But this vessel move got enough railfan attention (i.e. photos (update: and videos)) that I decided it gets its own notes.

John W. Coke posted five photos with the comment:
The nuclear reactor vessel, encased in steel cylinder weighing 770 tons, from Southern California’s decommissioned San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station has started to make its way toward Las Vegas by rail. At more than 1.5 million pounds, it will be the largest and heaviest object ever moved on a Nevada road.
Red McQueen 750 ton
Mark Wayman Emmert International is handling the complete move from rail to transload to truck and then transport to disposition site in Utah.

John W Coke shared
Larry Beightol Going to Arrowlime
1

2

3

4

5

Jeff Ketterman posted
This is what a REALLY big load on one of our huge 36-axle Schnabel cars looks like with a very tight clearance. They are inching their way thru this railroad bridge in California. This car can shift and lift the load when needed for tight clearances. Sometimes that makes all the difference.
The car alone weighs almost 800,000 lbs. It has a capacity of just over 2 million lbs. Let that sink in.
The loaded vessel shown on the car weighs 1.6 million lbs. Which brings the total on rail to 2.4 million pounds.
That’s a lot.
Jennifer Starr Can the old rail infrastructure support the weight?
Jeff Ketterman Jennifer, nothing moves without a full clearance run on every route for our cars and their loads by the railroads. Much engineering involved. AND, some of these loads move non-direct routes because direct route won’t handle the load.
Pat Armstrong McGowan Here I thought you were just an amazing musician and video maker.
Jeff Ketterman Pat, my REAL job is that of general manager for a heavy-duty rail car management company.
http://www.kasgro.com/
Jeff Ketterman Steve, we now have 500 heavy duty cars in our fleet.
Chip Bruner Afton canyon bridge cima sub 1 if what we called the 3 sisters [But I still don't know where that is.]

Jason Farmer shared
Patrick Cavanaugh As of 2012, there were 31 Schnabel cars operating in Europe, 30 in North America, 25 in Asia, and one in Australia.[1]
Glen Burgess How does the bridge take that weight?
Jim Bullock It depends on the length and capacity of the bridge. Each Schnabel car can carry about 890 tons spread out over 36 axles (72 33" dia wheels)!
I saw one carrying a nuclear reactor, traveling at 12 mph max! Impressive!
Dan Fitzgerald Axle loads and spacing, also [very slow] speed, no impact loading on bridge.

(new window)  At 10:19 is a daylight view.


I wonder if this is the train that delivered the car for the transport of the decommissioned nuclear reactor vessel. A comment mentioned that the CSX train lead the train all the way to California. Note in the above video that BNSF had two locomotives on it when it was loaded. And it doesn't need the two buffer flatcars when empty. It also looks to me that it can go faster than 10mph when empty.
(new window)



Saturday, April 18, 2020

NS Heartland Corridor

I've already studied the NS Cresent Corridor. The NS Hatfield Tunnels have motivated me to study the Heartland Corridor.

System Map with Corridors Tab
[It seems NS no longer has this map. Fortunately I had a copy in my analysis of intermodal traffic densities.]

(The references for the following information are Heartland and Conference.)

During the 1980's, the Heartland Corridor route was cleared for 19' 6" tall tri-level auto carriers. Most of this work was done by lowering the tracks. In the 1980s, other railroads developed the deep well, articulated flat cars to carry double-stacked containers, which effectively doubled the efficiency of railroad intermodal transport. But the 20' 3" height of a double stack would not fit in the tunnels on the eastern railroads.
20150510 1243
Not only was the height of the load important, but so was the "squareness" of the load. The covers on autoracks have curved corners so that they will more easily fit under the arched roof that many tunnels have. But containers have square corners. So to run double-stack trains between the ports in Virginia and the Midwest markets, NS had to enlarge 28 tunnels with a cumulative length of 5.5 miles.

Since many of the tunnels had bridges across the Tug River at their ends and the bottom of the tunnels were already lowered in the 1980s, going down further in the 21st Century was not an option. So they had to go up an average of 1.5' to provide the desired 21' clearance. (About half of the 28 tunnels were constrained by bridges on their end and had to go up. [BLET-2010]) (Hemphill Tunnels illustrates why a realignment done in 1903 caused so many tunnels to have bridges at their ends.) They also had to remove other overhead obstructions including bridges, signal structures, and slide detector fences. The Heartland Corridor will reduce the travel time from Hampton Roads to Chicago from 3 to 2 days.

Because Ohio wanted an intermodal terminal in Columbus as part of the transportation hub they were building around their airport and because Virginia wanted their Atlantic ports to remain relevant after the Panama Canal was expanded, they helped pay for the improvements. And Federal tax money was also involved. Taxpayers paid about half of the $188m clearance improvement project.

Because of a high-priority intermodal train in each direction run for UPS, the contractors had a work window each workday of just 10 hours. This allowed them and NS to reinforce the ceiling, grind away the top, and replace track, ballast and ties in just 15- to 20-feet sections each day. Work began in 2007 on a Saturday-Wednesday schedule because coal traffic was heavier at the end of the week. After the global recession in 2008 cut the demand for coal, the contractors worked Mon-Fri and avoided the expense of weekend overtime pay.

Some tunnels, such as the North Hatfield Tunnel, were dug through solid rock, so it was just a matter of grinding off more rock.

Scott Ogle post via DeBruler
Other tunnels were almost big enough, and it was just a matter of grinding little "ears" into the lining. This was "minor notching" because the amount of the tunnel liner removed (4 to 6 inches) did not compromise the structural integrity of the liner. I could not find an NS example. This photo is of the BNSF Cascades Tunnel.
A Lee Stone Photo via TheTunnelDiaries-Hemphills
Other tunnels required deep notches. I'm assuming that this Hemphill Tunnel #2 is an example of deep notching. Below we see two excavators, each with a diamond-tipped Alpine roadheader attachment, grinding the two notches.
Heartland

Deep notching removes enough liner material that the "shear stresses in the concrete at the notch exceed acceptable values and additional support measures are required." The liner is reinforced by bolting it to the rock "to develop arching action within the rock surrounding the tunnel, thereby allowing a stress transfer of the current tunnel lining loads from the concrete liner to the reinforced rock arch as the lining is notched. The maximum depth of the notch has been set to maintain at least 10” of intact concrete in the lining." [Conference, pp17-19] I reproduce this figure because it not only illustrates the rock dowels used to bolt the liner to the rock, it shows the clearance templates for autoracks and double-stacks. I presume that the clearance templates are wider at the top than the bottom to account for some rocking back and forth as the cars roll through the tunnels. But it doesn't allow for a lot of rocking. So the track must be kept in really good condition inside tunnels.
Conference, p19, Figure 4

elevation.maplogs,
License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA),
via Bridge Hunter
[This is Big Sandy #1. It was notched so deeply that it was treated as a crown
removal in terms of roof bolts and shotcreating. [BLET-2009
If notching would leave less than 10" of the liner intact, then they had to remove the tunnel's crown.  Crown removal is complicated and it takes multiple work windows to work a single section of track and the work needed depends upon the strength of the ground above the lining. "A section of lining will be removed along the length of the tunnel with any rock above the lining needed for clearance. Rock bolts and mesh would be installed immediately and in advance of the next train. That operation would be followed by additional excavation support measures including multiple layers of shotcrete reinforcement, lattice girders, spiling, etc., depending on the level of excavation support required for the actual ground conditions encountered." [Conference, p20] Below left we see the crown being removed in Cooper Tunnel. The photo of the portal shows that it is hard to determine how the tunnel was enlarged by looking at the portal because it looks like just notches.
Heartland
TheTunnelDiaries-Cooper



The fourth option is to remove the tunnel entirely, called daylighting. This option has the advantage that the bulk of the work, removing all of the rock and soil above the lining, can be done while trains are running. Only the removal of the lining itself would need to be restricted to the 10-hour work window per day. I don't know if NS daylighted any of its 28 tunnels. But BNSF removing the Cajon Pass Tunnels is a good example of daylighting.

Multiple contractors from all over the country were used so that multiple tunnels could be enlarged during each 10-hour work window. The project took three years to complete, 2007-2010. The roof of the Cooper Tunnel had eight courses of brick. [BLET-2010]


Thursday, February 6, 2020

I-294 Mile Long Bridge Rebuild in Hodgkins+Julstice, IL

Satellite, before
The Illinois Tollway has issued its largest contract of $184.6m to replace the northbound lanes.  [RoadBridges]

Read More via Project

(new window)



Frank Bauer posted three photos with the comment: "Bridge beams 294 mile long."
Frank Bauer 206 thousand lbs
William Tom Gurin I think they were 130.000 I was on that job.
1, cropped

2

3
Ben Stalvey New MLC?
I've been thinking of going there to try to get video of a beam lift. But I've been hesitant because I'm not confidant that I can find a legal parking spot in the area and because it is winter.

It looks like I have already missed the placement of several of the new beams. Perhaps paying attention to these webcams would be better than driving there anyhow.
Tollway

Tollway

I missed a Facebook post several weeks ago about the beams being transported, but the Chicago Tribune has an article on it.
Chicago Tribune, Feb 10, 2020, Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune
By Mary Wisniewski, the Getting Around columnist
They are concrete beams, each measuring as much as 7½ feet tall, 187 feet long, and weighing 245,000 pounds, traveling south from a factory in Janesville, Wisconsin.
The beams are the heaviest ever produced or shipped in the Midwest, according to Gary Courneya, operations manager for County Materials Corp. in Janesville. Currently, the longest concrete beams on the Tollway are 170 feet long, installed at the Fox River Bridge on the Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) and at the Des Plaines River Valley Bridge on the Veterans Memorial Tollway (Interstate 355).
The existing Mile Long Bridge, built in 1958, is a mix of concrete and steel beams. The rebuilt bridge will also have a mix, with 600 beams altogether, Kovacs said. The Mile Long Bridge is actually two bridges, going in each direction, and each will have 27 spans and 26 piers or support columns each way. The current bridge has 53 piers each way, so the number of piers has been cut in half, explained Kovacs....Transport trucks hauling the beams will be traveling this month between 4:30 a.m. and noon on weekdays, with all delivery schedules weather dependent. [Paul Kovacs is the chief engineering officer for the Tollway.]
The beams are going eastbound and down the Jane Addams (I-90) to I-290, then south to I-355, Interstate 80 and Interstate 57 before heading north on I-294. The trucks with the beams will be parked along I-294 near the 83rd Street Toll Plaza during the day, and the beams will be installed on new bridge piers constructed over the Des Plaines River during the overnight hours, according to Tollway officials.
Once the beam installation scheduled for February is complete, the Tollway will start taking delivery of steel beams for placement over Forest Preserve property and the Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal. About 110 steel beams from an Indiana manufacturing plant will be delivered, each measuring 120 inches tall and ranging in length from 57 feet to 134 feet long, the Tollway said.

Chicago Tribune, Feb 10, 2020
[I recognize MiJack as the equipment used in many intermodal yards to load and unload containers.]

Nic Tarasewicz posted two photos with the comment: "MLC300 one of the many cranes on the mile long bridge project on I294."
1

2



It looks like they are working on the second half.
The Walsh Group posted
Crews have started to place steel beams across the Des Plaines River for the I-294 Mile Long Bridge.
 [I wonder how they got the beams across for the first half. Did they use a crane on a barge?]

Actually, this project is up by the other mile-long bridge on I-294.
ALL Erection and Crane Rental posted four photos with the comment: "Central Contractors Service, a member of the ALL Family of Companies recently provided a stunning mix of both all-terrain and crawler cranes for an Illinois Tollway project. Check out the full article and list of cranes on our website here https://www.allcrane.com/resources/case-study/article/bridge-mix."
Willmot John: IUOE Local 150
1

2

3

4