Showing posts with label railroad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label railroad. Show all posts

Sunday, November 23, 2025

UP+NS and BNSF+CSX Railroad Overviews


Gaith Shtieh posted
This picture shows of the entire map system of Union Pacific purple line  is tracking rights
Red lines are operated by Union Pacific
Todd Taylor: *Pink Lines are operated by BNSF. 🤣
[In both cases, I think "operated" should be "owned."]

Jay Lewis commented on Gaith's post
..and here’s the U.P. with the Norfolk Southern.😒

Trains_2025aug
"The New York/New Jersey and Port of Virginia traffic will be interchanged in Chicago for the trip over BNSF to Kansas City. The domestic cross-country service will rely on the BNSF-CSX interchange at Birmingham, Ala., and BNSF’s haulage rights over CSX to Atlanta."

Trains_2025nov

Friday, October 20, 2023

BNSF coal train derailment north of Pueblo, CO, kills a truck driver and closes I-25 for days

(Satellite)

I quit documenting derailments because they are too frequent. But this one is special for two reasons: it had a fatality (truck driver) and it was caused by a broken rail during moderate weather.

safe_image for Both directions of I-25 closed after train derails north of Pueblo
Dennis DeBruler: The accident happened on a Sunday afternoon. The southbound lanes opened Wednesday afternoon, and all lanes were opened Thursday afternoon. The preliminary report is that it was caused by a broken rail.

Colorado State Police via CBSnews_20231015
"CSP [Colorado State Police] confirmed at approximately 3:30 p.m. a train carrying coal derailed on a bridge over I-25 just north of Pueblo, Colorado."

CBSnews_20231017, Helen H. Richardson
"Broken rail likely caused fatal Colorado train derailment, full closure of Interstate 25 stretches on for a third day."
"'Investigators will continue to determine the cause of the broken rail and why warnings systems did not alert the crews to the condition of the track as part of the ongoing investigation,' said Sarah Taylor Sulick, Public Affairs Specialist for the National Transportation Safety Board."
The truck driver was a 60-year-old man from California.

The southbound lanes reopened just after 2pm on Wednesday [CBSnews_20231018], and the northbound lanes reopened Thursday afternoon [CBSnews_20231019].
CBSnews_20231019, CBS
The name of the truck driver was Lafollette Henderson.
"The NTSB said a broken track east of the bridge over the interstate caused the derailment over the weekend, sending 30 rail cars filled with coal onto the interstate."

CBSnews_20231019, CBS
"Repairs to the bridge will take longer partly because there is confusion over which entity owns the bridge. BNSF Railway said the state has ownership. CDOT said they have conflicting records on the 65-year-old bridge."

I Love Trains posted four photos with the comment: "Photos courtesy of Daniel Malmquist  - Train derailment north of Pueblo Co over I 25. All lanes blocked and truck under the bridge."
1

2

3

4

Gail Atkins-Panalsek commented on the above post
Broken rail was undetected, train full of Powder River coal went over and bridge collapsed onto the semi, spilling many cars of coal all over. Train crew not injured but truck driver was crushed under everything.😢

BNSF replaced the bridge "between the evening of Dec 18th and the morning of Dec 19th [2023]. [@ 2:04]
7:34 video @ 5:41
He said the bridge span was put in place using the crane. I doubt that. I recognize the red things as the type of jacks on SPMTs that were used to install all of the spans for the BNSF shoefly bridge over I-295.



Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) for Locomotive Fuel

Ricardo Garcia posted two photos with the comment: "Always liked BNs natural Gas paint scheme."
Steven Leeson: That was a plumber's nightmare. They were with us in Tacoma for quite a while testing. The locomotive would switch to LPG in 5th notch and higher. Since LPG has less BTUs than diesel, they lost about 30 percent horsepower when it switched over. The fuel to air density ratio was really touchy, even a change in altitude or barometric pressure made a dramatic shift in power. Like it's former GP-9 that was also tried previously, it ended up being converted back to a conventional diesel. The GP-9 with 1000 Horsepower using LPG was useless and sent to Ceeco in Tacoma for parts. [I believe he meant LNG instead of LPG. The two locomotives were used to haul Powder River Basin coal trains during 1991-96. [qstation]]
1

2

In 1993, BN concluded LNG was reliable, safe and beneficial. [ieeexplore] So why did the project end in 1996? Because gas was only twice as cheap as diesel fuel back then. In 2013, it was five times as cheap and BNSF started another LNG trial. [RailwayAge] From the 1993 trials, BNSF did continue to use four 1200 HP switch locomotives built by Morrison-Kundsen until the end of their design lifetime. [WeAreThePractitionersoffshore] Yard switching has the advantage of low usage between overnight refills and the need for only one special refueling station. But now those fuel usage advantages make yard switching a candidate for battery power.

Natural gas becoming cheap because of fracking is why BNSF started another test program in 2013. LNG should start in long-haul, high density routes were a few refueling facilities can serve a lot of fuel usage. The 1990s experiment did revenue service between coal mines in Montana and power plants in Minnesota and BN's coal piers at Superior, WI. Today, intermodal trains between Los Angles and Chicago would be a good candidate. BN subcontracted the refueling to "Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., which was (and still is) in the business of safely handling gasses and cryogenic liquids."  [offshore, RailwayAge] 

One fuel tender design builds on container train technology.
WeAreThePractitioners
By double stacking the tanks, a tender can carry 20,000 gallons. That is enough fuel to travel the Los Angles-Chicago route without a refueling. Furthermore, refueling can consist of swapping the containers to reduce the dwell time in the terminals.

The remaining impediment to using LNG seems to be regulations. Railroads want to run unit trains of LNG from natural gas basins to ocean-going ports for export. Union and civic leaders are screaming about the safety issues of running "train bombs." [CBS12] First of all, I've seen both of these types of "leaders' complain about issues that really were not problems. I think some of them feel that they have to complain to justify the existence of their jobs. Second of all, a tender carries a lot less LNG than a unit train. Third of all, is it a bomb or just a big fire? Having read about unit trains carrying crude oil, I think all of these trains should have a tank car between the locos and the front-end buffer car that carries fire fighting foam material. And maybe even a foam generator that can be carried by a skid steer. If a town doesn't have a skid steer (landscape company, tractor dealer, etc.), a local farmer probably does. The same foam fighting solution could be used by LNG unit trains. Fourth of all, LNG is safer than propane. (BN contracted in 1990 with the Los Alamos National Laboratory for a safety analysis. LNG and CNG are safer than LPG (propane) [RailwayAge]) Do those civic and union leaders have any idea how much propane is rolling across our country in trucks as well as trains? When I was writing these notes, I happened to see a westbound BNSF mixed freight train when I was going back home from the library in Downers Grove, IL. So I did an analysis of all of the placarded tank cars. This is what I saw:
  • 4 2031: 157 Nitric acid, other than red fuming, with not more than 65% nitric acid
  • 4 1987: 127 Alcohols, n.o.s.
  • 1 3295: 128 Hydrocarbons, liquid, n.o.s.
  • 1 1760: 154 Ferrous chloride, solution
  • 1 1993: 131 Compound, cleaning liquid (flammable)
  • several 3257: 131 Nitriles, poisonous, flammable, n.o.s.   It is labeled HOT ASPHALT.
  • 1 1075: 115 Butane
In my placard notes, I have listed the results of analyzing some trains in the past.

I did a Google search on "lng iso container testing". I didn't read any of the results. I'm just happy there were some results. But I did not find anything that looked like crash testing LNG freight cars and tenders at the railroad testing facility in Colorado.

LNG reduces pollution, both particulates and emissions (CO2 and NOX), "perhaps even besting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's stringent Tier 4 air emission standard." [ProgressiveRailroading] Given the complexity of a Tier 4 locomotive, this has to be a significant advantage.

WeAreThePractitioners

CN borrowed the LNG tender pictured at the top of these notes to do experiments in 2012. They even repainted the tender in CN colors. These tender cars were designed to withstand the buff and draft forces within the locomotive consist because BN had frame and/or drawbar fatigue in the diesel tender cars that were used during the 1980s oil crises. Those 1980s tenders were just modified existing tank cars. [WeAreThePractitioners, RailwayAge] (Another article said CN borrowed a UP tender. [ProgressiveRailroading])

I noticed that the middle "locomotive" in this Florida East Coast consist looked strange. Then I remembered that they converted to using LNG and that "strange" unit would be the fuel tender. They converted in 2017. [CBS12] FEC is also hauling LNG containers between a New Fortress Energy liquification plant and Ports Miami and Everglades. [fecrwy]
Screenshot

Norfolk Southern is borrowing BNSF SD70ACes #9130 and #9131 for compressed natural gas experiments using a purpose built tender. The tender uses 28 separate CNG tanks. I'm glad to hear that it is several smaller tanks. But if a tank fails, are the other tanks strong enough to withstand any resulting boom from the first tank? The tender carries the equivalent of 4,600 gallons of diesel fuel. The experiment was planned to run for 6 months in 2019 or 2020. [trains] But I could not find any results of the experiment.
trains

BNSF reports that it evaluated LNG from 2013-17. [energy] They did develop a new tender for this trial and it carries 23,800 gallons. [rrpicturearchives] But I still can't find the results of that evaluation.

Update: just a few hours after I published, this came up on my Facebook timeline.
safe_image for PHMSA, FRA Capping LNG By Rail?




Saturday, November 14, 2020

Positive Train Control (PTC)


I've collected a couple of videos since then.

(new window)  A BNSF totuorial about PTC. At 2:28, it says it will stop the train with "a full service application." Is that emergency braking or is that maximum safe braking?



(new window) This is a hot (high priority) looking stack train that they have burning time on the mainline. He caught a second stopped train incident at 14:10. (It surprises me how bad radios still sound in the 21st Century.)


Before BNSF turned on PTC for the Metra trains in Chicagoland, they had to reprint the schedules because it took longer to turn around the trains. In particular, they had to wait 20 minutes while the PTC computers in the locomotive rebooted to go in the opposite direction. Later, when UP was going to turn PTC on, new schedules were announced. But somehow UP avoided the schedule change. I never understood how UP got around the 20-min reboot issue.

The deadline for implementing PTC is Dec 31, 2020. The freight railroads have invested $11b while the FRA has doled out $2.6b in grants and loans. [rail.nridigital] I assume the FRA assistance is for commuter railroads such as METRA that already have severe budget issues. And museums are going to quit running exhibition trains because they can't afford to add PTC equipment to their locomotives. And/or they don't want to destroy the historical integrity of the locomotives. The article didn't mention that one reason the original Dec 31, 2015, deadline was missed was that the FCC took a long time (over a year if I remember correctly) to allocate the frequencies needed by the many wayside radio stations that needed to be installed.

Since PTC includes in-cab signaling, why were new tri-color (Darth Vader) signals installed? For the benefit of the railfans? I think the real reason was for the preservation of jobs in the signaling department. I read an article that the installation of PTC should have been assigned to the Information Technologies Department instead of the Signaling Department. The signaling workers could have been retrained to help the IT department with the additional workload. The new signals are not only expensive, they preclude implementing more modern ways of running the trains such as "moving blocks." Actually, moving blocks could still be implemented by simply turning off all of that expensive new equipment.
20140607 0014
Looking West from Forest Avenue in Downers Grove, IL
The old signal bridge is behind the two new cantilevered bridges. I noticed that the brick base of the old interlocking tower is still standing on the left. It housed some of the old signaling equipment. It, as well as the old bridges, have been removed.

It is one thing for the general media like the Chicago Tribune to grab an inappropriate photo to spruce up an article, but it is another thing when a trade publication does it. The following photo is of CTA tracks, not Metra tracks. The latest I have read, Metra is one of four railroads that is at risk of missing the Dec 31, 2020, deadline.
rail.nridigital
Chicago loop junction. Rail operator Metra says that achieving PTC interoperability in Chicago will be complicated due to the complexity of the rail network. Image: Daniel Schwen.

Most workers in the trade would recognize the dozen double-slip switches at Tower A-2 as plenty complicated. They didn't need to use a photo of CTA tracks.
Satellite

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Applying a veneer on coal loads to control dust

Below the veneer discussion, I've included some videos of loading the coal cars.

I picked this spot on the video because the background cars show how they are supposed to be loaded. I wonder what caused the two cars in the foreground to be partially empty. This video explains why they no longer pile the coal down the middle of the car but load it flat across the top.
Screenshot @ 0:26
[Some comments said it was to prevent self igniting. But those comments have been shot down by other comments. It's a chemical designed to form a crust on top to prevent coal dust from blowing off the top. At least three comments called the chemical liquid latex and another called it a surfactant similar to soap. ]
A lot faster than the .3 mph+- we used to do it at.
Anton Svensson
 A sealant sprayed on the top to keep the dust down. Leaves a fine crust. We used something similar for the 200,000 ton storage coal pile at the power plant I worked at. It would seal the pile to help prevent washouts during heavy rains. If I remember correctly we mixed three 55 gallon drums into the 1,100 gallon water truck. Rode around n sprayed the sides.
Pete Keats
 yes, to keep the dust down. Our customer figured out they were losing 2 ton a car from tipple to port. [Since a car holds about 110 tons, that would be about a 2% loss. That savings explains why the railroads are willing to appear friendly to their urban neighbors. What appears to be dust control is really saving a lot of money.]
And when that train sits in the siding for a day or two in the rain, that solution sticks to the ties and causes track lights.


These videos show that they had to redesign the car loading chute to create a flat top for the veneer application.



This video shows the loading of three cars from the control house. But it doesn't show a good view of loading when near the end of the car. From what I could see, it looks like they are leaving some empty space at the end of each car.
















Sunday, August 23, 2020

Battery Powered Locomotives

A 4,400 hp road engine is to be tested in a lashup with conventional diesel-electrics on a 560 km route in California. BNSF and Wabtec have already tested a battery shunting (switch?) locomotive, but the article doesn't describe the results of that test. The 560 km test route is between Barstow and Stockton.  [RailwayGazette] I wonder how hilly that route is in terms of needing dynamic braking and short term traction and/or power boosts. I'd think batteries would perform best in hilly, but not mountainous, terrain.
safe_image for BNSF and Wabtec prepare to test battery-electric locomotive
CJ Miller So the conventional units do most of the work, and this thing captures the electricity from dynamic braking and then kicks in when the train needs short bursts of additional power? Makes sense in theory, but the costs and the maintenance seem like they'll add up pretty quickly. Oh well, at least they're trying something new, so good luck to them.
Daniel Joseph Day There has been some major breakthroughs made on batteries this past year. Tesla has been working on a high energy battery.
Ted Curphey The way I read some of the tech details on this locomotive is it cannot replace ANY of the diesel locomotives on existing trains, the batteries simply cannot hold enough charge to even come close to that. It only a adds a little to the pulling and braking power to obtain around 10~15% fuel savings on the train under ideal circumstances. Notice they still have the traditional dynamic brake grids because once the batteries are charged, it will switch to the grids as long as dynamic braking is needed.
Donny Albertson Ted Curphey if that’s the case they shouldn’t have bothered putting a cab on it.
Josh Delp Donny Albertson wouldnt you want that in the lead to reduce noise, and to get away from the fumes in tunnels?
Donny Albertson Josh Delp probably hot as hell like any electric loco. And they’re all pretty quiet these days anyhow but cabs are an expensive thing to maintain.
Liberty Ruddy it’ll likely be pulsed DC which is exactly what their ‘AC’ units use too. AC out of the genset, smoothed into DC on the DC link, then pulsed DC forming a dirty AC waveform via the IGBT’s to the 3 phase traction motors.
Jim Lee And the carbon footprint just to produce the BATTERIES is NEVER going to be redeemed if the engine ran without recharging for eight years. But it some yuppie thought that these would reduce pollution and reliance on fossil fuel. PT Barnum said it best " there a sucker born every day".

[At least this "GE" won't have turbo fires.]

Given that the weakness with genset locomotives was the lag for additional engines to start up when more power was needed, it seems that putting a battery pack on them to make them hybrids would be a  better solution. Not only could all three engines go offline sometimes, when an engine is running, it could run at its optimal fuel efficient load to recharge the battery.



safe_image for News Photo: Battery-electric locomotive set to leave Erie
BEL44C4D

safe_image for BNSF and Wabtec Commence Battery-Electric Locomotive Pilot Test in California

safe_image for A big switch for rail industry



Wednesday, July 1, 2020

More Shoving Platforms

I've already discussed cabooses being repurposed as shoving platforms. Since then I have come across cabooses being refurbished in current Class I liveries as shoving platforms and cars explicitly designed as a shoving platform.

Twice this past winter while driving down I-57, my wife and I saw a CN caboose setting in their yard south of Kankakee, IL. But we didn't have the camera ready for it. The third time down I-57, my wife had the camera ready, but no caboose. The first sighting was at the north end of the yard, and the second one was at the south side. So it does get used.

One use is as the shoving platform for grain trains on the Fisher Farmers Grain and Coal Railroad. They had been using this:

Mike Sypult posted
Today in Rantoul, Illinois on the old Havana, Rantoul & Eastern - later owned by Wabash, then IC "Pumpkin Vine", - now host to the Dewey, Illinois elevator grain trains.
Fortunately, others have caught photos of it, and it looks like they finally repainted it.
Jim Hester posted, cropped
On a spur in Rantoul IL.

Kenneth Gannaway posted two photos with the comment: "IC caboose (shoving platform) in Rantoul Illinois 01/23/17."

1

2

The alternative to the platform is that the conductor has to hang on to a ladder. I caught this southbound in Kankakee just north of the IC depot.
20160603 3398
At camera resolution

You can tell when a concept is rather new because different terms are in use for the same thing. 
Mark Olson commented on a post
The BN uses old cabooses for what they call "Riding Platforms" http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1782418
Because of "slack action" being very dangerous - the employee cannot ride IN the caboose when it is being used for reverse moves, they ride on the platform where they can apply train-line brakes and radio the engineer on the head end if they need to stop - the also have a warning whistle for traffic and pedestrians.
[Why is the slack action more dangerous now than when conductors and brakemen used to ride in them?]
Larry Grzywinski It's either that or ride the side of a car and get off and protect every crossing. Done a lot that in my time.
Mark Olson commented on his comment
Riding the side is not always an option and not as safe as riding on a platform - yes most of the time for short moves riding the side (I have done it too) but for longer reverse moves a riding platform is safer. Some railroads build them like this -
[I can't figure out where the conductor is supposed to stand on this one.]
Others in BNSF call them a "Shove Platform." Note the stenciling in the upper-right corner in these three photos posted by Richard Olson with the comment:
It’s a caboose;
no, it’s a shoving platform;
NO, it’s an EOT with a FRED!
BN 10792 tacked onto the rear of an EB manifest in the Pasco, WA west yard.
1

2

3

Rich Westerman posted four photos with the comment: "I found this stripped down shoving platform parked in Kankakee with a couple of GP38's. I'm guessing that its used mostly for switching the nearby Lehigh quarry. I hope that this thing spends its winters down south because Illinois Winter."
Todd Stevens Started as a pulpwood flat.
[I would think they would at least put a roof over middle. Railroading is done in the rain, snow and sun.]
1

2

3

4
I've seen a Santa Fe caboose a few times on the BNSF local that goes through Joliet, IL. But I was driving and had no chance to get photos. The one time the local rolls through while I'm railfanning at 

Ken Schmidt posted
Back in July of 1989, I was able to enter Inland Steel, and grab a few shots here and there. Sitting at the entrance of #2 BOF was Inland 124 with two shoving platforms.
Phil Martello: What is the purpose of the shoving platforms?
Ken Schmidt: Phil Martello They operate radio control, so this way, a single person can ride a shove while on the opposite end of the locomotive. And running on a platform is far safer than hanging onto the side of a car and try to run the unit.

Seth Lakin commented on Ken's post
one shoving platform on each end. They are cute little set ups, with two trucks each that are closely spaced and walk up steps. I don’t think the entire set up is 25 feet long.

Romeo Road, it has a custom shoving platform starting at 0:58.
(new window)


10:28 video @ 3:49
What is a Shoving Platform? | BNSF's Irvine Industrial Complex Local
This video discusses the usage and operation of Shoving Platforms on BNSF's Irvine Industrial Complex. Shoving Platforms are still commonly used on local railroad jobs throughout North America. This train features and ex-Burlington Northern Caboose retrofitted for shoving platform use. BNSF GP60s 119, 164, and 189 take the RCAL00162 local with BNSF 12568 leading the shove. 
[Note the conductor riding on the rear platform. Why would a train that has just three freight cars have three locomotives? (I quit watching because sheet-metal (railfan) videos bore me.)]


Saturday, April 18, 2020

NS Heartland Corridor

I've already studied the NS Cresent Corridor. The NS Hatfield Tunnels have motivated me to study the Heartland Corridor.

System Map with Corridors Tab
[It seems NS no longer has this map. Fortunately I had a copy in my analysis of intermodal traffic densities.]

(The references for the following information are Heartland and Conference.)

During the 1980's, the Heartland Corridor route was cleared for 19' 6" tall tri-level auto carriers. Most of this work was done by lowering the tracks. In the 1980s, other railroads developed the deep well, articulated flat cars to carry double-stacked containers, which effectively doubled the efficiency of railroad intermodal transport. But the 20' 3" height of a double stack would not fit in the tunnels on the eastern railroads.
20150510 1243
Not only was the height of the load important, but so was the "squareness" of the load. The covers on autoracks have curved corners so that they will more easily fit under the arched roof that many tunnels have. But containers have square corners. So to run double-stack trains between the ports in Virginia and the Midwest markets, NS had to enlarge 28 tunnels with a cumulative length of 5.5 miles.

Since many of the tunnels had bridges across the Tug River at their ends and the bottom of the tunnels were already lowered in the 1980s, going down further in the 21st Century was not an option. So they had to go up an average of 1.5' to provide the desired 21' clearance. (About half of the 28 tunnels were constrained by bridges on their end and had to go up. [BLET-2010]) (Hemphill Tunnels illustrates why a realignment done in 1903 caused so many tunnels to have bridges at their ends.) They also had to remove other overhead obstructions including bridges, signal structures, and slide detector fences. The Heartland Corridor will reduce the travel time from Hampton Roads to Chicago from 3 to 2 days.

Because Ohio wanted an intermodal terminal in Columbus as part of the transportation hub they were building around their airport and because Virginia wanted their Atlantic ports to remain relevant after the Panama Canal was expanded, they helped pay for the improvements. And Federal tax money was also involved. Taxpayers paid about half of the $188m clearance improvement project.

Because of a high-priority intermodal train in each direction run for UPS, the contractors had a work window each workday of just 10 hours. This allowed them and NS to reinforce the ceiling, grind away the top, and replace track, ballast and ties in just 15- to 20-feet sections each day. Work began in 2007 on a Saturday-Wednesday schedule because coal traffic was heavier at the end of the week. After the global recession in 2008 cut the demand for coal, the contractors worked Mon-Fri and avoided the expense of weekend overtime pay.

Some tunnels, such as the North Hatfield Tunnel, were dug through solid rock, so it was just a matter of grinding off more rock.

Scott Ogle post via DeBruler
Other tunnels were almost big enough, and it was just a matter of grinding little "ears" into the lining. This was "minor notching" because the amount of the tunnel liner removed (4 to 6 inches) did not compromise the structural integrity of the liner. I could not find an NS example. This photo is of the BNSF Cascades Tunnel.
A Lee Stone Photo via TheTunnelDiaries-Hemphills
Other tunnels required deep notches. I'm assuming that this Hemphill Tunnel #2 is an example of deep notching. Below we see two excavators, each with a diamond-tipped Alpine roadheader attachment, grinding the two notches.
Heartland

Deep notching removes enough liner material that the "shear stresses in the concrete at the notch exceed acceptable values and additional support measures are required." The liner is reinforced by bolting it to the rock "to develop arching action within the rock surrounding the tunnel, thereby allowing a stress transfer of the current tunnel lining loads from the concrete liner to the reinforced rock arch as the lining is notched. The maximum depth of the notch has been set to maintain at least 10” of intact concrete in the lining." [Conference, pp17-19] I reproduce this figure because it not only illustrates the rock dowels used to bolt the liner to the rock, it shows the clearance templates for autoracks and double-stacks. I presume that the clearance templates are wider at the top than the bottom to account for some rocking back and forth as the cars roll through the tunnels. But it doesn't allow for a lot of rocking. So the track must be kept in really good condition inside tunnels.
Conference, p19, Figure 4

elevation.maplogs,
License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA),
via Bridge Hunter
[This is Big Sandy #1. It was notched so deeply that it was treated as a crown
removal in terms of roof bolts and shotcreating. [BLET-2009
If notching would leave less than 10" of the liner intact, then they had to remove the tunnel's crown.  Crown removal is complicated and it takes multiple work windows to work a single section of track and the work needed depends upon the strength of the ground above the lining. "A section of lining will be removed along the length of the tunnel with any rock above the lining needed for clearance. Rock bolts and mesh would be installed immediately and in advance of the next train. That operation would be followed by additional excavation support measures including multiple layers of shotcrete reinforcement, lattice girders, spiling, etc., depending on the level of excavation support required for the actual ground conditions encountered." [Conference, p20] Below left we see the crown being removed in Cooper Tunnel. The photo of the portal shows that it is hard to determine how the tunnel was enlarged by looking at the portal because it looks like just notches.
Heartland
TheTunnelDiaries-Cooper



The fourth option is to remove the tunnel entirely, called daylighting. This option has the advantage that the bulk of the work, removing all of the rock and soil above the lining, can be done while trains are running. Only the removal of the lining itself would need to be restricted to the 10-hour work window per day. I don't know if NS daylighted any of its 28 tunnels. But BNSF removing the Cajon Pass Tunnels is a good example of daylighting.

Multiple contractors from all over the country were used so that multiple tunnels could be enlarged during each 10-hour work window. The project took three years to complete, 2007-2010. The roof of the Cooper Tunnel had eight courses of brick. [BLET-2010]