?: (Bridge Hunter)
1941: (Bridge Hunter; no Historic Bridges; 3D Satellite)BNSF, UP and Amtrak also use this KCS bridge.
Patrick Feller Flickr via BridgeHunter-1941, License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) Miss Eliza, Neches River, Beaumont, Texas 1302071335 [Patrick also has photos in BridgeHunter-1941 with trains crossing the bridge.] |
Cleveland State University Library Photograph Collection via BridgeHunter-1941 |
TxDOT It is a single-track bridge with a 20mph restriction. The lift span is 239' with a 200' channel. The vertical clearance is 13' when closed and 147' when open. -- Bridge is opened 231 times per year -- Second most important rail bottleneck in Texas [I'm shocked by the number of openings per year I could not find much shipping activity upstream on a satellite image. There were no ships and very few docks. (There is a lot downstream of the bridge.) Then I found a marina for pleasure boats. I wonder what the vertical clearance is when it is closed.] |
This is the post that motivated researching this bridge because the towers struck me as rather tall. When I remembered that a bridge in Beaumont may have to accommodate ocean-going ships, I decided to research this bridge.
Steven J. Brown posted Union Pacific and Kansas City Southern trains meet in Beaumont, Texas - April 17, 2021. Dennis DeBruler Judging by the height of the bridge's towers in the background, it was built for ocean-going ships. |
Jonathan Konopka posted A KCS train heading across the Neches River Lift Bridge in Beaumont, TX. Photo credit belongs to Steve Carter. |
As we would expect, this lift bridge replaced a swing bridge.
DeGolyer Library, Southern Methodist University via Flickr via BridgeHunter-? A comment indicates that UP has rights because this bridge used to carry Missouri Pacific as well as KCS. |
Did anyone notice the ballast near the edge of the bridge over the roadway in the Steven J. Brown photo. I once had ballast fall from the CNW/UP overpass on IL83 (Elmhurst) and dent the hood on my car. Startling to say the least.
ReplyDelete